2017
DOI: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1351423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review of faculty development for teacher educators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, both universities and their campuses (constituent and affiliated) had limited policy documents that specified how and why technologies should be part of teacher education courses. For example, when asked if the university had standards for its teaching staff and pre-service teachers, the Dean responded: Policies on technology use in education are of high significance because they impact all aspects of technology integration in education (Drent & Meelissen, 2008;Varvel, Montague, & Estabrook, 2007) and provide reasons for effective uptake of ICTs (Phuong, Cole, & Zarestky, 2018;Zhu, 2015). Therefore, the lack of policy was found to have farreaching consequences.…”
Section: Quaternary Contradiction: Policies Versus Technology Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both universities and their campuses (constituent and affiliated) had limited policy documents that specified how and why technologies should be part of teacher education courses. For example, when asked if the university had standards for its teaching staff and pre-service teachers, the Dean responded: Policies on technology use in education are of high significance because they impact all aspects of technology integration in education (Drent & Meelissen, 2008;Varvel, Montague, & Estabrook, 2007) and provide reasons for effective uptake of ICTs (Phuong, Cole, & Zarestky, 2018;Zhu, 2015). Therefore, the lack of policy was found to have farreaching consequences.…”
Section: Quaternary Contradiction: Policies Versus Technology Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Dunlap and Piro (2016), data literate educators can design effective databased learning activities. According to Kippers et al (2018), these educators are well placed to help learners to consciously collect and analyse data to construct knowledge; therefore, training programmes should foster research on pedagogical practices towards implementing data literacy activities whose impact can be assessed (Izadinia 2014;Phuong, Cole, and Zarestky 2017). Halverson et al (2007) propose to train educators in data projects with dynamics they can extrapolate to their courses, connecting data to support evidence-based approaches for teaching and learning, including activities such as data challenges, considering the guidelines of Piety, Court, and Hickey (2014) who suggest that dataled activities should include elements of ethics, privacy and information architecture.…”
Section: Academic Development On Critical Data Pedagogiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the globalization era, remaining up-to-date is a significant concern for many who aim to be professionals in their respective vocations, and work in academia and higher education institutions. Regarding the importance of educating academics, faculty development has been a topic of interest in North America for some time but requires further research in other parts of the world (Phuong, Cole, & Zarestky, 2018). Though the amount of literature focusing on the development and in-service training of teachers and school administrators working in the Turkish National Ministry of Education (Turkish acronym, MEB) continues to increase (e.g., Altan, 2016;Küçüksüleymanoğlu, 2006), faculty development is a new concept in Turkey and limited research has been completed regarding the training of academics, whether they are veteran or novice faculty members (Odabaşı, 2003;2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%