2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2016.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic literature review of sustainable purchasing and supply research: Theoretical perspectives and opportunities for IMP-based research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
127
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
127
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study used a systematic approach [10,11] to collect data and analyze literature. The systematic literature review approach can "minimize researcher bias regarding the inclusion or exclusion of studies and to clearly channel how and to what extent the review was performed through transparency" [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This study used a systematic approach [10,11] to collect data and analyze literature. The systematic literature review approach can "minimize researcher bias regarding the inclusion or exclusion of studies and to clearly channel how and to what extent the review was performed through transparency" [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The systematic literature review approach can "minimize researcher bias regarding the inclusion or exclusion of studies and to clearly channel how and to what extent the review was performed through transparency" [11]. Three key steps were included in the approach: review planning, review conducting, and finding reporting [10]. Our review approach was inductive in nature, since we classified and modified the scheme as we obtained information during the review process, rather than opting ex-ante for an analytic framework.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A systematic literature review is convenient to minimize researcher bias regarding the inclusion or exclusion of studies and to clearly channel how and to what extent the review was performed through transparency. The key steps for a systematic review, as described in detail by Johnsen et al [38], consists of planning the review, conducting the review, and reporting the findings. This section addresses the planning and the conducting of the review.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier research has dealt with several environmental and social issues, including sustainable apparel product development [34], sustainable fashion SCs [35], reverse logistics [36], logistics social responsibility [37], carbon accounting [38], the case of fair trade products [23], positioning stakeholder theory within the debate on CSR [39], social and environmental reporting [40,41], sustainable purchasing and supply [42], environmental impacts of production and consumption in country specific contexts [2], governance of sustainable SCs in the fast fashion industry [43], CSR in garment sourcing networks [10], multi tier sustainable SCs [16], and sustainability integration into global fashion operations [44]. Nonetheless, there is a further need in research to address the specific relationship between companies' internal and external sustainability strategies, and the influence of capabilities developed for sustainability management on operational performance areas.…”
Section: Conceptualizing Supply Chain Management and Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%