1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-8141(98)00017-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic method for analyzing magnitude estimation data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After the moving path, the participants were encouraged to move around the virtual prototypes using a finger mouse for better observation if needed. The participants rated four dimensions of customer impressions (luxuriousness, comfort, harmoniousness, and controllability) for each virtual prototype using the modified magnitude estimation rating ranging from 0 to 100 (Han et al, 1999;Yun et al, 2003). The anchors for the rating scales are exemplified in Figure 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the moving path, the participants were encouraged to move around the virtual prototypes using a finger mouse for better observation if needed. The participants rated four dimensions of customer impressions (luxuriousness, comfort, harmoniousness, and controllability) for each virtual prototype using the modified magnitude estimation rating ranging from 0 to 100 (Han et al, 1999;Yun et al, 2003). The anchors for the rating scales are exemplified in Figure 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free-modulus magnitude estimation method was used, which is widely used in psychophysics to evaluate human sensation to a physical stimulus (Han, Song, & Kwahk, 1999). The subjects numerically estimated their feelings of discomfort for a given posture without any standard stimulus and a corresponding number or verbal anchor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before conducting the main experiment, a pretest was conducted to familiarize the subject with the ratio judgment tasks and to screen out those who lacked the ability to perform ratio judgment. In this study, "numeric estimation" and "line production" were used in the pretest, because of their wide usage and practical ease (Han et al, 1999). To determine whether the subject had the ability to perform ratio judgments, simple linear regression analyses were performed on two sets of logarithmically transformed stimuli and responses data obtained during the pretest.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the magnitude estimation ability of participants, which is shown in Han et al (1999), was confirmed by a preliminary experiment that estimates the number as a line length and the line length as a number. Whether or not the estimating ability was evaluated by evaluating whether the 95% confidence interval of the regression equation after the logarithmic conversion of the line length and the number includes 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In this experiment, heaviness of the box was evaluated by modulus method based on weight value of reference box. This method can be used when the difference between the reference stimulus and the test stimulus is not large (Han et al, 1999). In this experiment, the reference stimulus was selected as a 198g box which did not change the weight of medium size among the nine boxes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%