2016
DOI: 10.1142/s0217595916500445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Overview of Operations Research/Management Science Research in Mainland China: Bibliometric Analysis of the Period 2001–2013

Abstract: Scholars from Mainland China have published 8541 papers in 79 Operations Research and Management Science (OR/MS) journals available on the ISI Web of Science (WOS). Data from 2001 to 2013 constitute the basis of the bibliometric method used in this paper for statistical analysis of status of OR/MS research in Mainland China, from the perspectives of number of papers, quality of papers, most productive institutions, co-author analysis, citations analysis and research topic analysis, etc. The results show that a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The keyword network in scientific literature can be used to explore the correlations between different research studies to reveal the potential research issues and the intellectual structure in a certain research field (Chen et al, 2019 ). This method has been widely used in bibliometric studies (Wu et al, 2016 ) and has proven effective (Khasseh et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The keyword network in scientific literature can be used to explore the correlations between different research studies to reveal the potential research issues and the intellectual structure in a certain research field (Chen et al, 2019 ). This method has been widely used in bibliometric studies (Wu et al, 2016 ) and has proven effective (Khasseh et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explore how the concepts of sustainability, well-being, and happiness have been jointly analyzed from academics, a bibliometric analysis, specifically the co-word analysis using SciMat (Cobo, Lòpez-Herrera, Herrera,& Herrera-Viedma, 2012b) was conducted. Thisaims to highlight the intellectual structure of one field (Wu,Xie, Dai, & Li, 2016;Khasseh, Soheili, Moghaddam, & Chelak, 2017). It explores the relationship between words in the documents and the frequency of word occurrence is supposed to reveal and reflect the association, origin, and evolution of the underlying themes (Cobo, Lòpez-Herrera, Herrera,& Herrera-Viedma, 2012a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometric analysis has been applied in several domains for understanding the dynamics of a scientific field [16]. Co-word analysis, introduced at the end of the 1970s by French bibliometric scientists [17], is the most widespread.…”
Section: Assessment Of Technology Network's Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%