2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09687-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Protein Refolding Screen Method using the DGR Approach Reveals that Time and Secondary TSA are Essential Variables

Abstract: Refolding of proteins derived from inclusion bodies is very promising as it can provide a reliable source of target proteins of high purity. However, inclusion body-based protein production is often limited by the lack of techniques for the detection of correctly refolded protein. Thus, the selection of the refolding conditions is mostly achieved using trial and error approaches and is thus a time-consuming process. In this study, we use the latest developments in the differential scanning fluorimetry guided r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One year later, colleagues in our group expanded the DGR approach by investigating the refolding agent arginine and other additives in systematic buffer screens (Wang et al 2017). Arginine has been widely used to suppress protein aggregation in refolding, and it can slow or prevent protein association reactions via weak interactions with the targets (Baynes et al 2005;Arakawa et al 2007), distinct from Fig.…”
Section: The Use Of Dsf In Buffer Screening and Optimization Of Protementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One year later, colleagues in our group expanded the DGR approach by investigating the refolding agent arginine and other additives in systematic buffer screens (Wang et al 2017). Arginine has been widely used to suppress protein aggregation in refolding, and it can slow or prevent protein association reactions via weak interactions with the targets (Baynes et al 2005;Arakawa et al 2007), distinct from Fig.…”
Section: The Use Of Dsf In Buffer Screening and Optimization Of Protementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been shown to increase the success rates of protein crystallization in past decades (Huynh and Partch 2015). More recently, DSF has also been applied to the challenge of sample preparation, with two publications demonstrating that suitable screening approaches can be used to identify and optimize sample refolding buffers-allowing significantly cheaper access to the amounts of protein sample required to support high-throughput screening campaigns (Biter et al 2016;Wang et al 2017). Finally, a very recent development has shown that DSF is able to provide reliable data in complex solutions, such as unpurified chemical reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein folding (or refolding) is affected by numerous variables such as temperature, ionic environment, small molecule additives, pH, etc. (Biter et al, 2016;Burgess, 2009;Clark, 1998;Middleberg, 2002;Wang et al, 2017). Unfortunately, conditions that favor proper protein folding over alternative non-productive pathways, notably protein aggregation, cannot yet be predicted a priori, dictating that refolding conditions must be determined empirically (Goldberg & Rainer Rudolph, 1991).…”
Section: Preparation Of a Dsf-guided Refolding (Dgr) Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is tedious and time‐consuming, due to the fact that protein folding is affected by numerous factors including salts and ions in solution, pH, additives and buffer composition, temperature, etc. (Anselment et al., ; Biter, de la Pena, Thapar, Lin, & Phillips, ; Wang et al., ). Thus, protein refolding has been referred to as a “method of last resort.” (Graslund, Nordlund, Weigelt, & Gunsalus, )…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation