2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-016-0490-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and comparative analysis of cross-document coreference resolution methods and tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, data curation [144]- [146] (i.e., the task of preparing the raw data for analytics) can help in turning raw data into contextualised data and knowledge. For example, curating a raw tweet from Twitter can tell us if the tweet contains a mention of a person named Barak Obama (using entity extraction and coreference reolution techniques [147]) who was the 44th president of the United States (using linking techniques [148] to link this entity to external knowledge sources such as Wikidata 7 ).…”
Section: Approach Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, data curation [144]- [146] (i.e., the task of preparing the raw data for analytics) can help in turning raw data into contextualised data and knowledge. For example, curating a raw tweet from Twitter can tell us if the tweet contains a mention of a person named Barak Obama (using entity extraction and coreference reolution techniques [147]) who was the 44th president of the United States (using linking techniques [148] to link this entity to external knowledge sources such as Wikidata 7 ).…”
Section: Approach Time Complexitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Singh, Wick, and McCallum (2010) proposed a discriminative model which is trained on a distantly labeled data set generated from Wikipedia. A recent review of the CR literature is provided by Beheshti et al (2017). CR has also been used in a joint task with entity linking (Monahan et al 2011;Dutta and Weikum 2015).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hameed et al provided a way to classify the recommended systems by calculating similarity (Kumar et al, 2017). Other scholars have also conducted research on keyword similarity matching models (Hameed et al, 2012Beheshti et al, 2017Zouaq et al, 2017;Ding et al, 2016). Among them, Kumar et al (2017) proposed a weighted semantic information extraction algorithm idea by extracting nouns and verbs from the marker data, then providing different possibilities for each noun or verb to extract semantic-based terms; next these weights were established using cosine similarity.…”
Section: Semantic Extraction Of Keyword Matching and Similarity Retrimentioning
confidence: 99%