2018
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13616.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and critical analysis of cost-effectiveness studies for coronary artery disease treatment

Abstract: Cardiovascular disease remains the primary cause of death Background among Australians, despite dramatic improvements in overall cardiovascular health since the 1980s. Treating cardiovascular disease continues to place a significant economic strain on the Australian health care system, with direct healthcare costs exceeding those of any other disease. Coronary artery disease accounts for nearly one third of these costs and spending continues to rise. A range of treatments is available for coronary artery disea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2015, about 110 million people were diagnosed with IHD, and 8.9 million patients were died from the disease, accounting for 15.9% of all deaths, and it has become the most common cause of death worldwide [5]. The current treatments for IHD include medications, anti-platelet therapy and surgery [7]. However, the side effects of these methods are unavoidable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2015, about 110 million people were diagnosed with IHD, and 8.9 million patients were died from the disease, accounting for 15.9% of all deaths, and it has become the most common cause of death worldwide [5]. The current treatments for IHD include medications, anti-platelet therapy and surgery [7]. However, the side effects of these methods are unavoidable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adoption of the recommended close to $110 M per year. Our findings add weight to a recent systematic review [2] that reported evidence from five cost effectiveness studies about treatments for stable coronary artery disease. Making changes to policy requires an understanding of the objectives of multiple relevant stakeholders.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…There is debate over the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of invasive treatments for patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease [1,2]. While coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is recommended for triple vessel disease, especially in the presence of diabetes mellitus and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction [3], many patients choose multi-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) over CABG as their starting treatment option [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This library also contains subfolders used to categorise papers during the review process. 10.5256/f1000research.13616.d190562 39 …”
Section: Data Availabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%