A systematic review and meta-analysis of comprehensive interventions for pre-school children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD)

Abstract

BackgroundThere has an increasing number of published trials on psychosocial intervention programmes for pre-school children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To achieve better quality of unbiased evidence for the effectiveness of ASD interventions, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive review that covers studies with adequate quality standards, such as randomised controlled trials (RCTs), and different types of intervention In this study, we categorize interventions for ASD as behavioural, social-communication focused, and multimodal developmental based on Howlin’s classification of early interventions for children with ASD. The aim of this study was to compare these three models and investigate the strengths and weaknesses of each type of intervention and to identify the approaches that contribute to a successful outcome for children with autism.MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included RCTs targeting children with ASD 6 years old or younger. A random effects model was used to present the effect estimate for the outcomes. This study also performed combined meta-analyses of all the three models to investigate the overall effectiveness of the intervention programmes.Results32 randomized controlled studies were found to be eligible for inclusion. The synthesized data included 594 children from 14 RCTs. There was no statistically significant difference in the effects on autism general symptoms between the social-communication-focused model and the multimodal developmental model (p = 0.83). The results suggest that there is evidence of an effect on ‘reciprocity of social interaction towards others’ (standard mean difference [95% confidential interval] = 0.53[0.29,0.78], p<0.01) and ‘parental synchrony’ (SMD = 0.99[0.70,1.29], p<0.01).ConclusionThe small number of studies included in the present study limited the ability to make inferences when comparing the three models and investigating the strengths and weaknesses of each type of intervention with respect to important outcomes. Since the outcome of ‘reciprocity of social interaction towards others’ could be a dependent variable that might be context-bound to interactions with the child’s parent, we cannot conclude the interventions for pre-school children with ASD have significant effects on a generalized skill to engage in reciprocal interactions with others. However, the outcomes of ‘reciprocity of social interaction towards others’ and ‘parental synchrony’ may be promising targets for interventions involving pre-school children with ASD.Trial registrationProspero CRD42011001349

Review of Early Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Focused on Randomized Controlled Trials

“…There are overlaps between these classifications, since JA can be included as social skills, and ABA can improve social skills; nevertheless, for the purposes of this review, we arbitrarily divided early interventions according to the principles and technique emphasized by the authors. This classification is largely consistent with previous research, in which interventions were divided into behavioral, social-communication focused, and multimodal developmental interventions [11]. There were 3 studies using ABA early intervention, 8 studies using JA early intervention, and 7 studies using SC early intervention.…”

Early Restoration ofShank3Expression inShank3Knock-Out Mice Prevents Core ASD-Like Behavioral Phenotypes

“…Approximately 0.5-1% of all individuals with ASD have SHANK3 mutations (Jiang and Ehlers, 2013). Loss-of-function of one copy of SHANK3 is a known cause of Phelan-McDermid Syndrome (PMS), a cause of ASD and intellectual disability (Phelan, 2008;Costales and Kolevzon, 2015;Tachibana et al, 2017;Mitz et al, 2018). ASD is characterized by the presentation of two core phenotypes, deficits in social interaction/communication and restricted interests and repetitive behaviors.…”

Dietary Interventions for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-analysis

“…1 Educational, psychosocial, and pharmacologic interventions appear to improve associated psychiatric symptoms and functioning in people with ASD, especially if applied at early developmental stages. 1,2 Yet few treatments are efficacious for the core symptoms of autism, with only early and intensive treatments revealing improvements on dyadic and/or social interaction deficits. 3,4 Many patients with ASD and their relatives seek alternative medicine and nonmedicine treatment strategies.…”