A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of denture adhesives

Shu, Xin; Fan, Yanpin; Lo, Edward Chin Man; Leung, Kcm

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103638

Cited by 16 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…On the contrary to what one would expect, a better retention of the maxillary denture by means of MDI did not significantly improve the objective mastication. Similar observations were reported when denture adhesives were used [ 41 ]. An early study [ 42 ] mentioned that this is caused by the reduced sensitivity of the food manipulating organs which gives rise to inefficient manipulation of food during chewing.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Comparing Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Mini Dental Implant Overdentures, Complete Removable Dentures and Dentate Subjects

Doorne

Backer

Matthys

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Mini dental implant (MDI) overdenture rehabilitation for the edentulous maxilla is a valuable, less invasive and affordable treatment alternative for complete removable dentures (CRD). However, comparative quantification of masticatory performance in different oral conditions are scarce. Purpose: This study compares objective masticatory performance of dentate groups, maxillary CRD and MDI overdentures and subjective masticatory performance in maxillary CRD and MDI overdentures. Materials and Methods: Four groups were defined, age 20+ dentate dental students (DS), age 50+ complete dentate subjects (DP), age 50+ maxillary CRD or MDI overdentures/dentate mandible. Objective masticatory performance was evaluated by measuring circular Variance of Hue (VOH) or the mixture degree of two-color chewing gum (Hue-check View Gum® Test). Additionally, subjective masticatory comparison was investigated in the CRD and MDI groups, with a visual analogue scale (VAS) for different food consistencies and the Oral Health Related Quality of Life (OHRQL) OHIP-14 questionnaire. Results: The mean VOH was 0.11 (SD 0.50, range 0.05–0.27) for the dentate dental 20+ students, 0.13 (SD 0.08, range 0.03–0.31) for the 50+ dentate group (p = 0.774), 0.41 (SD 0.41, range 0.14–0.76) for the CRD group and 0.39 (SD 0.18, range 0.07–0.76) for the MDI group (p = 0.725). Based on the VAS scores, no improvement was found between the CRD and the MDI overdenture group (p > 0.050). The mean OHIP-14 total score was 12.10 (SD 15.87, range 0–56) for CRD, while the MDI group (p = 0.039) saw a significant improvement to 2.85 (SD 2.85, range 0–15). Conclusion: Comparable results in objective masticatory performance were registered in dentate 20+ and 50+ subjects with a remarkable inferior outcome for the CRD and MDI group. Compared to CRD, MDI overdentures revealed no substantial improvement in subjective and objective masticatory performance. However, for MDI a significant increase in OHRQL was apparent.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Comparing Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Mini Dental Implant Overdentures, Complete Removable Dentures and Dentate Subjects

Doorne

Backer

Matthys

et al. 2021

JCM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Recently, de Groot et al [ 18 ] analyzed the functional results in six patients who underwent digitally planned OFF flap reconstructions. The authors reported that, compared with traditional methods, digitally planned reconstructions provide better mixing ability but similar maximum mouth opening and bite force.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…All these reports assessed the masticatory performance at a certain time point only. As can be predicted, the masticatory performance was influenced by oral pain, local inflammation, and so on [ 18 ]. Then it was believed that there would be a dynamic change of masticatory performance after surgery, but unfortunately this issue was rarely evaluated.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Masticatory performance in patients undergoing free fibula flap for mandible reconstruction

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To explore the masticatory performance in patients undergoing an osteo(cutaneous) free fibula (OFF) flap for mandible reconstruction by a prospective design. Methods A total of 56 patients who had undergone OFF flap reconstructions for mandibular reconstruction secondary to malignant (squamous cell carcinoma) or benign (ameloblastoma) tumor resection were prospectively enrolled. They were asked to complete the masticatory performance test by the weigh method and the chew domain of the University of Washington quality of life questionnaire (version 4) preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The pair nonparametric test was used to analyze the dynamic change of masticatory performance and subjective chew function. Results Fifty-one patients were included for analysis finally. The mean masticatory performance for patients with malignant tumors were 53.4% ± 10.3%, 36.4% ± 10.3%, 42.6% ± 9.6%, 52.8% ± 10.9%, and 53.1% ± 11.8% preoperatively, at 2 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Compared with the preoperative level, the masticatory performance had a significant reduction immediately after surgery (p < 0.001), followed by a return to the baseline level within three months. A similar trend was noted for those with benign tumors. The mean score of chew domain for patients with malignant tumors were 100 ± 0, 54.3 ± 32.9, 81.4 ± 24.5, and 92.9 ± 17.8 preoperatively, at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. Compared with the preoperative level, the subjective chew function was greatly affected within the first three months (p < 0.001), and it gradually recovered to the baseline level in the following nine months. A similar trend was noted in patients with benign tumors. Conclusions The masticatory performance and subjective chew function was significantly affected after OFF flap reconstructions in the short term, but both recovered to the preoperative levels within 9–12 months.

show abstract

“…The masticatory performance of CD wearers and its change after 1-month of DA use did not significantly influence the decision to continue using DA. Previous studies reported that DA use in newly-fabricated CD wearers significantly improved their masticatory performance [ 6 , 26 – 28 ], both in normal and resorbed ridges [ 27 ]. However, our study found no masticatory performance improvement after 1-month of DA use, either in well-fitting or ill-fitting denture, or in any patients’ condition based on ACP classification.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Decision to use denture adhesive in complete denture wearers after one-month run-in period: A quasi-experimental study

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this study was to assess two patient-based outcomes of complete denture (CD) wearers who continued or discontinued using denture adhesive (DA) after one-month run-in period of DA use. Methods This quasi-experimental study comprised 76 CD wearers. The two patient-based outcomes were oral health-related quality of life and masticatory performance, determined by the Thai-version of oral impacts on daily performances index and multiple sieve method of 20-stroke peanut mastication. Denture retention and stability were evaluated using the CU-modified Kapur criteria to classify the CD into acceptable or unacceptable quality. The outcomes were collected at 3 time points: 1) at baseline (T0), 2) after a 1-month run-in period of DA use (T1), at which time the participants decided whether to continue using DA, and 3) 1-month after continuing or discontinuing using DA (T2). Changes in the percentages of having an oral impact from T0 to T2 were evaluated using the McNemar’s test. The effect of denture quality and the decision to use DA on peanut particle size across time points were assessed using repeated measures ANOVA. The peanut particle size changes in each group between time points were evaluated using the one-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc comparison test. Results The participants who continued using DA at T2 had greater oral impact reduction after the 1-month run-in period of DA use, whereas cleaning and emotional impacts emerged in those who discontinued using DA. At T1 and T2, the peanut particle size of the participants who continued and discontinued using DA was not significantly changed from T0, except for the acceptable CD wearers who discontinued using DA at T2, whose peanut particle size decreased from T0 to T2. Conclusions Baseline oral impacts and their change influenced CD wearers’ decision whether to continue using DA. However, masticatory performance did not affect the patients’ decision.

show abstract

A systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of denture adhesives

Cited by 16 publications

References 34 publications

Comparing Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Mini Dental Implant Overdentures, Complete Removable Dentures and Dentate Subjects

Comparing Masticatory Performance of Maxillary Mini Dental Implant Overdentures, Complete Removable Dentures and Dentate Subjects

Masticatory performance in patients undergoing free fibula flap for mandible reconstruction

Decision to use denture adhesive in complete denture wearers after one-month run-in period: A quasi-experimental study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About