2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials of social network interventions in type 2 diabetes

Abstract: ObjectivesIn the care of patients with type 2 diabetes, self-management is emphasised and studied while theory and observations suggest that patients also benefit from social support. We sought to assess the effect of social network interventions on social support, glycaemic control and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes.Research design and methodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EBM Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL through April 2017 for randomis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
43
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework of network mechanisms proved useful for exploring actions and also showed fields of network‐related actions that participants did not use. This corresponds with research that shows that most actions in networks are aimed at individuals and directed at the existing network and that few actions council participants to break social ties or to find new ties (Latkin & Knowlton, ; Spencer‐Bonilla et al, ). This study shows how participants find it hard to navigate the neighbourhood in search of informal caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The framework of network mechanisms proved useful for exploring actions and also showed fields of network‐related actions that participants did not use. This corresponds with research that shows that most actions in networks are aimed at individuals and directed at the existing network and that few actions council participants to break social ties or to find new ties (Latkin & Knowlton, ; Spencer‐Bonilla et al, ). This study shows how participants find it hard to navigate the neighbourhood in search of informal caregivers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This finding indicates that, from the perspective of the patients, living with T2DM could be synonymous with feeling alone with poor social support from significant others, 7 Journal of Diabetes Research regardless of evidence that psychosocial support is helpful in adaptive behaviours by patients with T2DM [49]. Support and care from the social networks of patients including health care professionals, family, friends, neighbours, colleagues, and fellow patients with T2DM could help them take positive stances, build resilience, relieve distress, and improve on their well-being [50,51]. Furthermore, care and support from formal and familial contacts have positive effects on the medication adherence behaviour in patients with T2DM due to the encouragement of optimism in such patients [52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When DSMP is reviewed as a shared responsibility with the whole family, older persons may adopt DSMP activities more easily and feel more self-confident in managing diabetes [52]. As family-focused interventions may be more effective in improving DSMP performance than individual-focused interventions, including family members or friends in education programmes should be considered [53][54][55][56].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%