2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review and meta-analysis of probiotics for the management of radiation induced bowel disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
33
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This meta-analysis found that, for the incidence of diarrhea, the probiotic group had a significant reduction, as the pooled OR = 0.47 (95% CI of 0.28-0.76; P = 0.002). For subgroup analysis, the pooled OR of RID is 0.48 (95% CI of 0.27-0.85; P = 0.01), consistent with the result of Hamad et al 23 However, for the CID, the probiotic group seemingly had unclear numerical reduction in the incidence of diarrhea, as the pooled OR is 0.40 (95% CI of 0.15-1.03; P = 0.06), probably because the small number of studies and patients about chemotherapy were included. However, disappointedly, there was nonsignificant reduction in the frequency of CTC Grade ⩽ 2 diarrhea (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.67-2.64, P = 0.42).…”
Section: Efficacysupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This meta-analysis found that, for the incidence of diarrhea, the probiotic group had a significant reduction, as the pooled OR = 0.47 (95% CI of 0.28-0.76; P = 0.002). For subgroup analysis, the pooled OR of RID is 0.48 (95% CI of 0.27-0.85; P = 0.01), consistent with the result of Hamad et al 23 However, for the CID, the probiotic group seemingly had unclear numerical reduction in the incidence of diarrhea, as the pooled OR is 0.40 (95% CI of 0.15-1.03; P = 0.06), probably because the small number of studies and patients about chemotherapy were included. However, disappointedly, there was nonsignificant reduction in the frequency of CTC Grade ⩽ 2 diarrhea (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.67-2.64, P = 0.42).…”
Section: Efficacysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…22,23 However, few systematic reviews and metaanalysis were performed for abdominal and pelvic radiotherapy or CID for the cancers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although probiotic usage has been shown to be safe in a variety of other clinical settings, 12,13,16,26,27 several case reports suggest that the probiotic itself may have caused bacteremia in the setting of HCT. [30][31][32] Our results suggest that LBP administration is both safe and feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 Clinical trials and systematic analysis have suggested that probiotics are safe and may be beneficial for immunocompromised adults, adults with cancer receiving abdominal radiation and a wide range of pediatric conditions. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Although some studies have not demonstrated a benefit of probiotic therapy, systematic reviews and meta-analysis have attributed much of the inconsistency in the literature to the testing of variable doses, duration and strains. 15,18,19 Moreover, there has been a lack of studies elucidating the mechanisms of probiotics in a controlled clinical setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…superoxide dismutase and catalase)sults. 38 A prebiotic is "a selectively fermented ingredient that allows specific changes, both in the composition and/or activity in the gastrointestinal microflora that confers benefits upon host well-being and health", whereas synergistic combinations of pro-and prebiotics are called synbiotics. 39 …”
Section: Biological Systems Probioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%