A systematic review and narrative synthesis of inclusive health and social care research with people with intellectual disabilities: How are co‐researchers involved and what are their experiences?

Abstract

Background Using inclusive research methods with people with intellectual disabilities is increasingly common. A recent consensus statement identified key elements when conducting and reporting inclusive research with people with intellectual disabilities. This review identifies the range of health and social care research topics using inclusive research methodologies, systematically appraises the involvement of researchers with intellectual disabilities, and identifies facilitators and barriers to inclusive research. Researchers' experiences of engaging with inclusive research are synthesised. Method Seventeen empirical studies focused upon inclusive health and social care research were identified. The associated inclusive research methodologies employed, and the stages in which researchers with intellectual disabilities were involved, along with the experiences of researchers with and without intellectual disabilities were synthesised. Results Papers focused on a broad range of health and social care topics and largely employed qualitative or mixed‐methods designs. Researchers with intellectual disabilities were frequently involved with data collection, analysis and dissemination. Facilitators of inclusive research comprised sharing power, team working, having sufficient resources and making research methodologies accessible. Conclusions Researchers with intellectual disabilities are involved in a wide range of methodologies and research tasks. How the added value of inclusive research is measured and its impact on outcomes, require consideration.

Working collaboratively with an online advisory group of people with learning disabilities in covid-times: carrier pigeons, cats and drones

“…what difference does it make that none of the research was carried out with people who were the subject of the research. Hewitt et al [ 40 ] argue: Whilst conducting inclusive research is important, it is equally important to reflect on and evaluate this work to allow greater impact of future inclusive research. Understanding exactly what has happened in inclusive research projects is essential, both in terms of the scope of inclusive researchers, and evaluating the quality of the research….…”

Cooperation with Persons with Intellectual Disabilities: Reflections of Co-Researchers Associated with Conducting Inclusive Research

“…In either case, participation in the project expanded their repertory of skills (e.g., communicative, digital, and social) and contributed to empowerment. Meta-analytical studies and investigations addressing the experience of inclusive research confirm that participation in such undertakings creates opportunities to enhance the potential of persons with intellectual disabilities (Dorozenko et al 2016;McDonald and Stack 2016;Puyalto et al 2016;Frankena et al 2018;Armstrong et al 2019;Hewitt et al 2023).…”

Eight principles of neuro-inclusion; an autistic perspective on innovating inclusive research methods

“…For instance, it is recognized that when conducting participatory research there may be challenges with funding and the coordination and allocation of roles ( König et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, the research process may require additional implementation time when compared with traditional methods ( Hewitt et al, 2023 ). Despite an inclusive approach increasing community engagement ( Aldridge, 2012 ), challenges with demographic recruitment, and autistic representation in research, are not frequently addressed.…”