A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Psychometric Properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale and the Visual Analog Scale for Use in People With Neck Pain

Abstract

Objectives: To conduct a systematic search and synthesis of evidence about the measurement properties of the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) as patientreported outcome measures in neck pain research.Methods and Materials: CINAHL, Embase, PsychInfo, and MedLine databases were searched to identify studies evaluating the psychometric properties of the NPRS and the VAS used in samples of which > 50% of participants were people with neck pain. Quality and consistency of findings were synthesized to arrive at recommendations.Results: A total of 46 manuscripts were included. Syntheses indicated high-to-moderate-quality evidence of good-to-excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.58 to 0.93) test-retest reliability over an interval of 7 hours to 4 weeks. Moderate evidence of a clinically important difference of 1.5 to 2.5 points was found, while minimum detectable change ranged from 2.6 to 4.1 points. Moderate evidence of a moderate association (r = 0.48 to 0.54) between the NPRS or VAS and the Neck Disability Index. Findings from other patient-reported outcomes indicated stronger associations with ratings of physical function than emotional status. There is limited research addressing the extent that these measures reflect outcomes that are important to patients.Discussion: It is clear NPRS and the VAS ratings are feasible to implement, provide reliable scores and relate to multi-item patientreported outcome measures. Responsiveness (meaningful change) of the scales and interpretation of change scores requires further refinement. The NPRS can be a useful single-item assessment complimenting more comprehensive multi-item patient-reported outcome measures in neck pain research and practice.

Cervical Motor and Nociceptive Dysfunction After an Acute Whiplash Injury and the Association With Long-Term Non-Recovery: Revisiting a One-Year Prospective Cohort With Ankle Injured Controls

“…Further investigations of initial active motor dysfunction and pain development, nociceptive sensitization, and the spread of pain in whiplash-associated disorders are still needed. The present results emphasize the complexity of neck injury exposure, thereby demonstrating the importance of including biological, psychological, and social factors in future studies ( 38 – 41 ). Furthermore, standardization of clinical and paraclinical measures should pave the road for future studies and hopefully bring along new treatment options after “apparently” mild neck injuries.…”

Patient-Reported Quality of Life versus Physical Examination in Treating Temporomandibular Disorders with Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections: An Open-Label Clinical Trial

“…The answer to each of the questions can be collected in an 11-point (0–10) form, be it VAS or the numeric rating scale (NRS) [ 56 ]. Both VAS and NRS are considered reliable in assessing pain and give similar results in comparative studies [ 57 , 58 ].…”

Is transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy via vestibular approach safe for total thyroidectomy compared to open thyroidectomy? A propensity-score matched cohort study of 101 matched patient pairs with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

“…In addition, the mandible was pressurized for 12 hours. The pain of each patient without the use of analgesics was assessed on the day-1 post-operation, according to the visual analog scale (VAS) [17] .…”