2018
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15091879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Access to General Healthcare Services for People with Disabilities in Low and Middle Income Countries

Abstract: Background: A systematic review was undertaken to explore access to general healthcare services for people with disabilities in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: Six electronic databases were searched in February 2017. Studies comparing access to general healthcare services by people with disabilities to those without disabilities from LMICs were included. Eligible measures of healthcare access included: utilisation, coverage, adherence, expenditure, and quality. Studies measuring disability us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
92
2
11

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
9
92
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Articles were screened into two groups. One group was qualitative papers focusing on access to primary healthcare by people with disabilities in LMIC for this current review, while the second was for a quantitative systematic review focusing on access and uptake of general healthcare services in LMIC by people with disabilities completed by TB and HK [23]. In July 2019, the same database search strategy was applied again by TB for the period of 2017-2019, to update the qualitative literature review, with the inclusion of additional terms to limit the findings to qualitative studies only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Articles were screened into two groups. One group was qualitative papers focusing on access to primary healthcare by people with disabilities in LMIC for this current review, while the second was for a quantitative systematic review focusing on access and uptake of general healthcare services in LMIC by people with disabilities completed by TB and HK [23]. In July 2019, the same database search strategy was applied again by TB for the period of 2017-2019, to update the qualitative literature review, with the inclusion of additional terms to limit the findings to qualitative studies only.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from high income contexts suggests that, in comparison to non-disabled people, people with disabilities attend fewer routine health examinations [19], and are less likely to receive preventive care [14,[20][21][22]. This impact on healthcare access has also been reflected in data from LMICs [23]. While limited, evidence also suggests that when people with disabilities do seek healthcare, they receive poorer quality services [16,[24][25][26][27] and incur greater expenses [4,26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite these limitations, it does appear that the prevalence of mental health conditions is linked to the presence of physical/sensory functional difficulties. Access to rehabilitation and mental health services is frequently poor in LMICs [19], and there are well documented barriers to healthcare access for individuals with a disability [31,32]. The association of mental health and physical/sensory functional difficulties implies that there should be more integrated care between rehabilitation/specialist care and mental health services, and that general/primary healthcare services should be aware of comorbidities and multiple support requirements.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The United Nations Convention on the Rights of People with Disabilities (UNCRPD), which has been ratified by 177 countries, codifies the rights of people with disabilities to full inclusion on an equal basis as others [5,6]. However, people with disabilities still face large inequalities in realising their rights, which is evident by disparities compared to people without disabilities in social participation and access to education, healthcare, and employment [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%