2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11747-019-00679-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of brand transgression, service failure recovery and product-harm crisis: integration and guiding insights

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
334
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(348 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
10
334
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike most recovery research-which is mostly experimental with a main focus on customers' reactions-we examine the effects of our predictions on profitability. By doing so, we answer recent calls urging recovery researchers to incorporate financial metrics (Khamitov, Grégoire, and Suri 2020;Van Vaerenbergh et al 2019). Although the estimated net revenue improvements (up to 1.3%) are seemingly small, they are substantial for airlines because they are achieved with limited additional fixed costs.…”
Section: General Discussion and Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Unlike most recovery research-which is mostly experimental with a main focus on customers' reactions-we examine the effects of our predictions on profitability. By doing so, we answer recent calls urging recovery researchers to incorporate financial metrics (Khamitov, Grégoire, and Suri 2020;Van Vaerenbergh et al 2019). Although the estimated net revenue improvements (up to 1.3%) are seemingly small, they are substantial for airlines because they are achieved with limited additional fixed costs.…”
Section: General Discussion and Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…That is, a single article may contain more than one study. b In self-selected context, the respondents are usually asked to remember a recent CX, whereas varied contexts indicate studies with more than one context (Khamitov, Grégoire, and Suri 2020).…”
Section: The Tcq Nomenclature: Methodological Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time might be ripe to integrate SFR classics, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews into the quantitative-objective domain to take this stream to the next level. Quantitative researchers should realize that the behavioral-subjective domain offers a large variety of well-articulated theories such as justice theory, attribution theory, the disconfirmation paradigm, the service quality paradigm, appraisal theories, and the revenge and forgiveness framework (Khamitov, Grégoire, and Suri 2020). In addition, behavioral SFR offers clear definitions and valid scales for most constructs.…”
Section: Solid Building Blocksmentioning
confidence: 99%