2016
DOI: 10.1111/anae.13378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of capnography for sedation

Abstract: SummaryWe included six trials with 2524 participants. Capnography reduced hypoxaemic episodes, relative risk (95% CI) 0.71 (0.56-0.91), p = 0.02, but the quality of evidence was poor due to high risks of performance bias and detection bias and substantial statistical heterogeneity. The reduction in hypoxaemic episodes was statistically homogeneous in the subgroup of three trials of 1823 adults sedated for colonoscopy, relative risk (95% CI) 0.59 (0.48-0.73), p < 0.001, although the risks of performance and det… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted 2 meta-analyses: 1 to update the meta-analysis in Waugh and colleagues 9 evaluating detection of adverse respiratory events and 1 to update the meta-analysis in Conway and colleagues 8 evaluating the risk of developing hypoxemia. Fixed-effects models would assume that the true effect of capnographic monitoring is the same in every study and that differences between study results are solely due to chance, whereas random-effects models relax this assumption and instead assume that the effect of capnographic monitoring for individual studies varies around some overall average effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We conducted 2 meta-analyses: 1 to update the meta-analysis in Waugh and colleagues 9 evaluating detection of adverse respiratory events and 1 to update the meta-analysis in Conway and colleagues 8 evaluating the risk of developing hypoxemia. Fixed-effects models would assume that the true effect of capnographic monitoring is the same in every study and that differences between study results are solely due to chance, whereas random-effects models relax this assumption and instead assume that the effect of capnographic monitoring for individual studies varies around some overall average effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 2 were relevant systematic reviews and metaanalyses. 8,9 The search strategies in these 2 articles were similar, excepting that Conway and colleagues 8 were less restrictive regarding patient population and publication language.…”
Section: Search Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Third, we did not collect blood gas measurement or transcutaneous capnography in this trial, which may be more accurate to assess respiratory state of children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy. [37,38] Finally, we only discussed 3 different combinations of DEX-RF, studies should be carried out to verify the feasibility of more different doses of DEX-RF used in children undergoing flexible bronchoscopy in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%