A systematic review of community-based research interventions for domestic violence survivors.

Ragavan, Maya I.; Thomas, Kristie A.; Medzhitova, Julia; Brewer, Nathan; Goodman, Lisa A.; Bair-Merritt, Megan

doi:10.1037/vio0000183

Cited by 20 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Additionally, all interventions or evaluation of interventions were excluded as we were specifically focused on survivors’ needs and lived experiences. A review of interventions developed using a CBPR approach, authored by the same research team, is available (Ragavan, Thomas et al, 2018).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After excluding duplicate articles, 6,516 articles remained. This search term was used to find articles for the current systematic review, as well as a previous review authored by the same team (Ragavan, Thomas et al, 2018). For the current review, we conducted an additional search for articles published in 2017.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Early efforts to bridge the gap between DV research and practice led to the adoption of CBPR by handfuls of researchers and advocates (Edleson & Bible, 2001), and interest in CBPR has persisted over the years. For example, a recent systematic review of DV interventions highlighted articles published between 1997 and 2017 using a CBPR approach to evaluate effectiveness (Ragavan, Thomas et al, 2018). To our knowledge, that study is the only systematic review documenting the use of CBPR in the DV field.…”

Section: Community-based Participatory Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Exploring the Needs and Lived Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Minority Domestic Violence Survivors Through Community-Based Participatory Research: A Systematic Review

Ragavan

Thomas

Fulambarker

et al. 2018

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is a methodological approach where community–academic teams build equitable relationships throughout the research process. In the domestic violence (DV) field, CBPR may be particularly important when conducting research with racial and ethnic minority DV survivors, as this group faces concurrent oppressions that inform their lived experiences. To our knowledge, no systematic review has synthesized articles using a CBPR approach to explore the needs and lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority DV survivors. Using PRISMA guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of the literature, retrieving articles that used a CBPR approach to understand the needs and/or lived experiences of female racial and ethnic minority DV survivors residing in the United States. Articles were identified from peer-reviewed databases, bibliographies, and experts. Thirteen of the 185 articles assessed for eligibility were included. Articles focused on a variety of racial and ethnic minority groups, the majority identifying as African American or Latina. Collaboration occurred in multiple ways, primarily through equitable decision-making and building team members’ strengths. Several needs and lived experiences emerged including gender identity and patriarchal attitudes, racism and discrimination, the immigrant experience informing DV, poverty, shame and stigma, and the need for social support. This is the first systematic review of articles using a CBPR approach to explore the needs and lived experiences of racial and ethnic minority survivors. Implications include promoting community-based dissemination, conducting quantitative studies with larger sample sizes of DV survivors, and encouraging culturally specific services that address DV survivors’ intersectional needs.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Community-based Participatory Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Exploring the Needs and Lived Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Minority Domestic Violence Survivors Through Community-Based Participatory Research: A Systematic Review

Ragavan

Thomas

Fulambarker

et al. 2018

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 18 of the 86 reviews (21%) [1,34,47,49,53,54,59,61,62,65,66,73,84,86,88,89,92,100,105] detailed information could be extracted on the engagement of stakeholders in different phases of the research process (e.g. planning phase, conducting research, dissemination of findings) ( Table 3).…”

Section: Nature Of Stakeholder Engagementmentioning

confidence: 99%

A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature

Hoekstra

Mrklas

Khan

et al. 2020

Health Res Policy Sys

163

162

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Conducting research in partnership with stakeholders (e.g. policy-makers, practitioners, organisations, patients) is a promising and popular approach to improving the implementation of research findings in policy and practice. This study aimed to identify the principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts reported in different types of reviews of research partnerships in order to obtain a better understanding of the scope of the research partnership literature. Methods: This review of reviews is part of a Coordinated Multicenter Team approach to synthesise the research partnership literature with five conceptually linked literature reviews. The main research question was 'What principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts are reported in different types of research partnership approaches?'. We included articles describing a literature review of research partnerships using a systematic search strategy. We used an adapted version of the Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool to assess quality. Nine electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2018. Principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts were extracted from the included reviews and analysed using direct content analysis. Results: We included 86 reviews using terms describing several research partnership approaches (e.g. community-based participatory research, participatory research, integrated knowledge translation). After the analyses, we synthesised 17 overarching principles and 11 overarching strategies and grouped them into one of the following subcategories: relationship between partners; co-production of knowledge; meaningful stakeholder engagement; capacity-building, support and resources; communication process; and ethical issues related to the collaborative research activities. Similarly, we synthesised 20 overarching outcomes and impacts on researchers, stakeholders, the community or society, and the research process.

show abstract

“…• The setting of the intervention is the community We have focused on interventions in this category where the focus of the intervention is the community. The interventions described include community participatory research, like those described by Ragavan et al's systematic review on community participatory research on domestic violence [44], as well as interventions that are 'community placed', where the community is a target of the intervention, and might not have been involved in the design of the intervention, in a participatory way.…”

Section: Community-focused/ Network Social Support Interventionsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a key public health issue, with a myriad of physical, sexual and emotional consequences for the survivors of violence. Social support has been found to be an important factor in mitigating and moderating the consequences of IPV and improving health outcomes. This study's objective was to identify and assess network oriented and support mediated IPV interventions, focused on improving mental health outcomes among IPV survivors.

show abstract

A systematic review of community-based research interventions for domestic violence survivors.

Cited by 20 publications

References 43 publications

Exploring the Needs and Lived Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Minority Domestic Violence Survivors Through Community-Based Participatory Research: A Systematic Review

Exploring the Needs and Lived Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Minority Domestic Violence Survivors Through Community-Based Participatory Research: A Systematic Review

A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature

A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About