2012
DOI: 10.1177/0363546512442330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Complications and Failures Associated With Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation

Abstract: Background Patellofemoral instability affects activities of daily living and hinders athletic participation. Over the past 2 decades more attention has been paid to medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL) for treatment of recurrent patellar dislocations/subluxations. Numerous techniques have been reported; however, there is no consensus regarding optimal reconstruction. Purpose This study sought to report on the various techniques for MPFL reconstruction described in the literature and to assess… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

9
432
6
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 416 publications
(456 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
9
432
6
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The advantages of the described technique are as follows: anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL and MPTL; maintenance of the patellar insertion of the quadricipital and patellar tendons, avoiding the need for hardware or perforation of the patella, which can lead to fracture of the patella 11 ; and the possibility of graft tensioning at different degrees of flexion, thus preserving the function of each ligament. With the use of previous reconstructions, the distal insertion of the flexor tendons is maintained, which does not coincide with the insertion of either the MPTL or the MPML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The advantages of the described technique are as follows: anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL and MPTL; maintenance of the patellar insertion of the quadricipital and patellar tendons, avoiding the need for hardware or perforation of the patella, which can lead to fracture of the patella 11 ; and the possibility of graft tensioning at different degrees of flexion, thus preserving the function of each ligament. With the use of previous reconstructions, the distal insertion of the flexor tendons is maintained, which does not coincide with the insertion of either the MPTL or the MPML.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical failure presenting with persistence of objective or subjective instability totaled 12%. 11 We hypothesize that recurrence of instability may be caused by progressive loosening due to increased stress on the reconstructed MPFL. The reconstruction of one of the secondary restrictor ligaments (the MPTL or the MPML) could decrease the stress on the MPFL and thus could improve functional outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant percentage of complications associated with MPFL reconstruction occur because of technical errors, which typically involve improper graft position or tension (or both). 15,16 Recurrent instability can occur when the graft is too loose or if fixation on either the femoral or patellar side fails. Conversely, over-tightening or malpositioning of the graft can lead to maltracking, stiffness, and excessive medial compressive forces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Because of the risk of patellar fracture, some surgeons advocate not drilling the patella. When we drill the patella using this technique, the tunnel is small (5 mm in diameter) and short (20 to 25 mm in length).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%