2019
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14970.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of criminal recidivism rates worldwide: 3-year update

Abstract: Background: Comparing recidivism rates between countries may provide useful information about the relative effectiveness of different criminal justice policies. A previous 2015 review identified criminal recidivism data for 18 countries and found little consistency in outcome definitions and time periods. We aimed to update recidivism rates in prisoners internationally. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of criminal recidivism rates in prisoners and followed PRISMA guidelines. Using five bibliographic i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, external validation is often overlooked, even in HICs ( 10 ). Thus, it is not known whether these tools are applicable to LMICs, given potential differences in effects of risk factors and base rates of reoffending in various countries ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, external validation is often overlooked, even in HICs ( 10 ). Thus, it is not known whether these tools are applicable to LMICs, given potential differences in effects of risk factors and base rates of reoffending in various countries ( 11 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a recent review (Yukhnenko et al, 2019), 58.4% of released prisoners in North America will likely be reconvicted within 2 years (for property, drug-related, violent, or public order offenses). Within 3 years, 21% will be arrested for a new violent offense (Alper et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in prevalence of TB and HIV between residents and new entrants into correctional facilities was not statistically significant. This is possibly due to the following reasons: (a) individuals entering correctional facilities come from socioeconomically disadvantaged backgrounds where prevalence of TB and HIV is already high 1 ; (b) there are high rates of recidivism 35 ; and (c) detainees spend long periods in police cells, which have similar conditions to the correctional facilities. 36 37 However, the small sample size and wide CIs especially for the new entrants are a limiting factor for drawing any inferences from this comparison.…”
Section: Study Findings In Relation To Other Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%