A systematic review of cross-cultural measures of resilience and its promotive and protective factors

Abstract

As psychological resilience has been increasingly recognized as contextually constructed, mixed methods studies that map out local ecologies of resilience have become increasingly common. However, the direct adaptation of quantitative tools for cross-cultural use based on qualitative findings has been relatively lacking. The current review aims to provide an overview of existing measures of resilience used cross-culturally and to synthesize the protective and promotive factors and processes (PPFP) of resilience identified within these measures into a single resource. A January 2021 search of PubMed for studies of the development of psychological resilience measures that excluded studies of non-psychological resilience yielded 58 unique measures. These measures contain 54 unique PPFP of resilience, ranging from individual to communal-level characteristics. This review is intended to serve as a complementary tool for adapting standardized measures for stakeholders requiring an assessment tool that is attuned to their context for mental health risk assessment and intervention evaluation.

Beyond grades

“…Psychological well-being is a crucial aspect of students' current quality of life, and there is also a tight connection between psychological health in the adolescent years and in later adult life. For example, research has demonstrated that students who experience depression, anxiety and other psychological issues might also develop problematic behaviours (Huebner, Funk and Gilman, 2000 [39]; Huebner, 2004[40]; Sun and Shek, 2009 [41]).…”