2023
DOI: 10.1111/aos.15788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of diabetic retinopathy screening intervals

Jocelyn J. Drinkwater,
Amy Kalantary,
Angus W. Turner

Abstract: The current evidence on whether annual diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening intervals can be extended was reviewed. A systematic review protocol was followed (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022359590). Original longitudinal articles that specifically assessed DR screening intervals were in English and collected data after 2000 were included. Two reviewers independently conducted the search and reviewed the articles for quality and relevant information. The heterogeneity of the data meant that a meta‐analysis was not appropr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(173 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, different entities have recommended extending the control period from one to two years for patients with well-managed DM, but what this looks like has not been defined. A recently published systematic review article [9] evaluated a total of 11 relevant studies, in which the interval between visits ranged between 2 and 5 years. However, only three of them used a DR prediction algorithm [10][11][12], that developed by Aspelund et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, different entities have recommended extending the control period from one to two years for patients with well-managed DM, but what this looks like has not been defined. A recently published systematic review article [9] evaluated a total of 11 relevant studies, in which the interval between visits ranged between 2 and 5 years. However, only three of them used a DR prediction algorithm [10][11][12], that developed by Aspelund et al [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of personalizing and extending intervals has been entertained since the start of this century and has gained increasing traction in recent years. This is partially due to accumulating evidence suggesting that biennial and even longer intervals may be safe for most patients with diabetes [8,[90][91][92][93][94]. In fact, the Danish national guideline states that the screening interval can be extended by up to 4 years for those with well-regulated diabetes who have not previously had diabetic retinopathy [83,85].…”
Section: Diabetic Retinopathy Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%