A systematic review of dissemination and implementation science capacity building programs around the globe

Abstract

Background Research centers and programs focused on dissemination and implementation science (DIS) training, mentorship, and capacity building have proliferated in recent years. There has yet to be a comprehensive inventory of DIS capacity building program (CBP) cataloging information about activities, infrastructure, and priorities as well as opportunities for shared resources, collaboration, and growth. The purpose of this systematic review is to provide the first inventory of DIS CBPs and describe their key features and offerings. Methods We defined DIS CBPs as organizations or groups with an explicit focus on building practical knowledge and skills to conduct DIS for health promotion. CBPs were included if they had at least one capacity building activity other than educational coursework or training alone. A multi-method strategy was used to identify DIS CBPs. Data about the characteristics of DIS CBPs were abstracted from each program’s website. In addition, a survey instrument was developed and fielded to gather in-depth information about the structure, activities, and resources of each CBP. Results In total, 165 DIS CBPs met our inclusion criteria and were included in the final CBP inventory. Of these, 68% are affiliated with a United States (US) institution and 32% are internationally based. There was one CBP identified in a low- and middle-income country (LMIC). Of the US-affiliated CBPs, 55% are embedded within a Clinical and Translational Science Award program. Eighty-seven CBPs (53%) responded to a follow-up survey. Of those who completed a survey, the majority used multiple DIS capacity building activities with the most popular being Training and Education (n=69, 79%) followed by Mentorship (n=58, 67%), provision of DIS Resources and Tools (n=57, 66%), Consultation (n=58, 67%), Professional Networking (n=54, 62%), Technical Assistance (n=46, 52%), and Grant Development Support (n=45, 52%). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first study to catalog DIS programs and synthesize learnings into a set of priorities and sustainment strategies to support DIS capacity building efforts. There is a need for formal certification, accessible options for learners in LMICs, opportunities for practitioners, and opportunities for mid/later stage researchers. Similarly, harmonized measures of reporting and evaluation would facilitate targeted cross-program comparison and collaboration.

Positioning implementation science in national immunization programmes to improve coverage equity and advance progress toward Immunization Agenda 2030: An urgent global health imperative

“…Since implementation science is a relatively new field of study, training is a worthwhile investment to ensure that people are conducting actual implementation research and not general health service research. There are several implementation science capacity-building programmes around the world, 39 and through partnerships and collaboration, these institutions can be engaged to train immunization stakeholders.…”

MOOC-based blended learning for knowledge translation capacity-building: A qualitative evaluative study

“…Capacity-building initiatives in knowledge translation (KT) are struggling to meet worldwide demand, especially among low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) [1,2]. Researchers or those in charge of KT (in intermediary positions between research and practice) must develop skills to communicate research results effectively to those who can benefit from them [3].…”

A Nurse-Led Implementation Science Specialist Program

“…This strategy was considered a priority for our health care system. Capacity-building activities to establish the program included conferences, consultations, obtaining funding and technical assistance, developing training materials and a toolkit, and recruiting mentors 19. The work was postponed due to the COVID-19 pandemic but resumed in 2021.…”