2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2020.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Vascular Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…23 See Table 2 for a comparison of methodologic and reporting quality of economic evaluations across various specialties. 1–81…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…23 See Table 2 for a comparison of methodologic and reporting quality of economic evaluations across various specialties. 1–81…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Unfortunately, the most common type of economic evaluation in the surgical literature is partial economic evaluation (i.e., cost analysis). [5][6][7][8][9] The usefulness of cost analyses is generally low, as often only costs are compared and all other outcomes are assumed to be equivalent. 3 Many new interventions are purported to be "cost-effective," but this term is often misused in surgical literature.…”
Section: Ementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…19 Diseases managed by vascular surgeons, like PAD and AAA , impose a significant healthcare burden. 20 In countries with limited resources like Pakistan, the use of AI will prove cost-effective for managing these issues by reducing the need for human resources. 19 AI can reduce human errors through precise programming, ensuring accuracy by leveraging predetermined algorithms based on previous information.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%