2022
DOI: 10.1080/21693277.2022.2127428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of empirical studies on green manufacturing: eight propositions and a research framework for digitalized sustainable manufacturing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 145 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this vein, increasing attention is devoted by research to understand whether digitalization can be directed towards sustainability principles and lead to sustainable innovations. Some studies reveal that DTs can be seen as resources that can have positive implications for the achievement of sustainable development goals (Del Río Castro et al, 2021), sustainable manufacturing (Despeisse et al, 2022), circular economy (Agrawal et al, 2022), and socioecological sustainability (Stock et al, 2018) through their creative deployment. However, other studies reveal that the potential of DTs to stimulate social and environmental value creation is controversial (e.g., Akande et al, 2019; Beier et al, 2020; Unwin & Unwin, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this vein, increasing attention is devoted by research to understand whether digitalization can be directed towards sustainability principles and lead to sustainable innovations. Some studies reveal that DTs can be seen as resources that can have positive implications for the achievement of sustainable development goals (Del Río Castro et al, 2021), sustainable manufacturing (Despeisse et al, 2022), circular economy (Agrawal et al, 2022), and socioecological sustainability (Stock et al, 2018) through their creative deployment. However, other studies reveal that the potential of DTs to stimulate social and environmental value creation is controversial (e.g., Akande et al, 2019; Beier et al, 2020; Unwin & Unwin, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%