2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of evidence-based interventions for child and adolescent mental health problems in low- and middle-income countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children from families with lower socio-economic status were more likely to suffer from mental illness than those from families with higher status. Similarly, a study conducted in Norway (Kinge et al, 2021), a systematic review conducted in low- and middle-income countries (Ribeiro et al, 2023), and a systematic review conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (Stracke et al, 2023) all found that children’s mental health was related to their parents' socio-economic status. This could be because a low socio-economic status causes social stress and stigma, both of which contribute to poor mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children from families with lower socio-economic status were more likely to suffer from mental illness than those from families with higher status. Similarly, a study conducted in Norway (Kinge et al, 2021), a systematic review conducted in low- and middle-income countries (Ribeiro et al, 2023), and a systematic review conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic (Stracke et al, 2023) all found that children’s mental health was related to their parents' socio-economic status. This could be because a low socio-economic status causes social stress and stigma, both of which contribute to poor mental health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for an investigation of the interrelationships between PSU and mental health outcomes in diverse populations to inform future research. Identifying bridges between the two constructs would help design tailored prevention and intervention programs for developing countries, where access to evidence-based mental health treatment is limited (Ribeiro et al, 2023). Moreover, it is worth highlighting that many of the interventions investigated targeting PSU are also available in highly developed countries (Basenach et al, 2023), underscoring the disparity in access for people living in these countries.…”
Section: The Network Approach Of Psumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to this, increased attention is being paid to utilize the evidence-based mental health interventions (EBmhIs), or psychological treatments and modes of mental health care services delivery that are supported by empirical evidence and research demonstrating their effectiveness, and translate them into practice to improve the mental health outcomes ( Muñoz & Cooper, 2022 ; Safieh et al , 2022 ; World Health Organization, 2022 ). Considering a global point of view, testing and implementation of EBmhIs has been more prevalent in high-income countries (HICs) than in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) ( Ingleby, 2014 ; Ribeiro et al , 2023 ; Tiley & Kyriakopoulos, 2018 ). Notably, in all settings, the actual uptake and implementation of EBmhIs in routine care settings ( Beidas et al , 2021 ; McHugh & Barlow, 2010 ; Shafran et al , 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, in all settings, the actual uptake and implementation of EBmhIs in routine care settings ( Beidas et al , 2021 ; McHugh & Barlow, 2010 ; Shafran et al , 2009 ). And this has been particularly challenging for settings that are low in resources for mental health such as LMICs where there has been scant research on the applicability and sustainability of EBmhIs (that are mostly developed in HICs) ( Ingleby, 2014 ; Rajabzadeh et al , 2021 ; Ribeiro et al , 2023 ; Tiley & Kyriakopoulos, 2018 ). Ultimately, the limited research and implementation has been associated with a range of factors such as lack of discussion of mental health in public health priority agenda, lack of political will, financial resources, and poor community participation, to name a few ( Tiley & Kyriakopoulos, 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%