2015
DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0311-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of factors influencing student ratings in undergraduate medical education course evaluations

Abstract: BackgroundStudent ratings are a popular source of course evaluations in undergraduate medical education. Data on the reliability and validity of such ratings have mostly been derived from studies unrelated to medical education. Since medical education differs considerably from other higher education settings, an analysis of factors influencing overall student ratings with a specific focus on medical education was needed.MethodsFor the purpose of this systematic review, online databases (PubMed, PsycInfo and We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
37
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, students’ general interest was included as it has been identified as a potential source of bias in medical students’ ratings of teaching [34]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, students’ general interest was included as it has been identified as a potential source of bias in medical students’ ratings of teaching [34]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,200 students from some universities in Jiangxi, China were surveyed by Wang Xinxin [7], the results of the survey showed that the satisfaction of female students with the teaching effect of teachers were lower than that of male students, which was consistent with the results of this study. However, some studies had found that female students were more satis ed with the overall grade and teaching satisfaction than male students [8]. Female college students' dissatisfaction with the teacher's teaching effect during the epidemic may be related to the fact that female were more concerned about the teacher's various behaviors, and more critical to the teacher.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would have been a stronger study if other UAEU clerkships were included and other NBMESEs considered. The student perceptions of clinical experience could be biased by single outstanding events rather than reflecting the quality of the actual clinical teaching experiences (Woloschuk et al, 2011;Schiekirka and Raupach, 2015). Also the perceived low authenticity of the clinical experiences could have negatively affected student academic performance, as authenticity reflects the degree of student inclusion into the clinical placement climate (Billett, 2002;Strand et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%