A Systematic Review of Hospital Trauma Team Activation Criteria for Children

Abstract

Objectives: Hospital trauma activation criteria are intended to identify children who are likely to require aggressive resuscitation or specific surgical interventions that are time sensitive and require the resources of a trauma team at the bedside. Evidence to support criteria is limited, and no prior publication has provided historical or current perspectives on hospital practices toward informing best practice. This study aimed to describe the published variation in (1) highest level of hospital trauma team activation criteria for pediatric patients and (2) hospital trauma team membership and (3) compare these finding to the current ACS recommendations. Methods: Using an Ovid MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations search, any published description of hospital trauma team activation criteria for children that used information captured in the prehospital setting was identified. Only studies of children were included. If the study included both adults and children, it was included if the number of children assessed with the criteria was included. Results: Eighteen studies spanning 20 years and 13,184 children were included. Hospital trauma team activation and trauma team membership were variable. Nearly all (92%) of the trauma criteria used physiologic factors. Penetrating trauma (83%) was frequently included in the trauma team activation criteria. Mechanisms of injury (52%) were least likely to be included in the highest level of activation. No predictable pattern of criterion adoption was found. Only 2 of the published criteria and 1 of published trauma team membership are consistent with the current American College of Surgeons recommendations. Conclusions: Published hospital trauma team activation criteria and trauma team membership for children were variable. Future prospective studies are needed to define the optimal hospital trauma team activation criteria and trauma team membership and assess its impact on improving outcomes for children.

Mapping the Flow of Pediatric Trauma Patients Using Process Mining

“…Determining appropriate triage is difficult, and there is a significant variation in triage criteria used across pediatric trauma centers. 47 At the study site, the current triage criteria could be refined by taking a closer look at Bravo encounters. We also identified an opportunity for improvement in patient flow.…”

Adding age-adjusted shock index to the American College of Surgeons' trauma team activation criteria to predict severe injury in children

“…Although clear standards for undertriage and overtriage rates are not published, the benchmarks for field triage (<5% undertriage, or 1-sensitivity, and <35% overtriage, or 1-specificity) are often applied to in-hospital triage. The ACSCOT does not provide supporting evidence for mandating the use of the ACS-6 in pediatric trauma patients, and a 2019 systematic review by Drendel and colleagues 14 found considerable variability in published trauma team activation criteria and limited scientific justification for the use of the ACS-6. Clearly, the ACS-6 alone do not adequately identify children in need of the highest level of trauma center resources.…”

Critically Ill Children in a Swiss Pediatric Emergency Department With an Interdisciplinary Approach: A Prospective Cohort Study

“…Numbers of trauma patients may differ at similar-sized centers without level one status. It is well-known that the criteria for TTA vary among institutions (23), and different activation thresholds may result in considerable variation in the numbers of trauma calls. However, even for a designated level 1 center, the case load only adds up to two TTA per month, making major trauma an infrequent scenario.…”