A systematic review of implicit bias in health care: A call for intersectionality

Abstract

Background and objectives: Health disparities are a growing concern in health care. Research provides ample evidence of bias in patient care and mistrust between patient and providers in ways that could perpetuate health care disparities. This study aimed to review existing literature on implicit bias (or unconscious bias) in healthcare settings and determine studies that have considered adverse effects of bias of more than one domain of social identity (e.g., race and gender bias) in health care.
 Methods: This is a systematic review of articles using databases such as EBSCO, Embase, CINAHL, COCHRANE, Google Scholar, PsychINFO, Pub Med, and Web of Science. Search terms included implicit bias, unconscious bias, healthcare, and public health. The inclusion criteria included studies that assessed implicit bias in a healthcare setting, written in English, and published from 1997-2018.
 Results: Thirty-five articles met the selection criteria – 15 of which examined race implicit bias, ten examined weight bias, four assessed race and social class, two examined sexual orientation, two focused on mental illness, one measured race and sexual orientation, and another investigated age bias.
 Conclusions: Studies that measured more than one domain of social identity of an individual did so separately without investigating how the domains overlapped. Implicit Association Test (IAT) is a widely used psychological test which is used to determine existence of an implicit bias in an individual. However, this study did not find any use of an instrument that could assess implicit bias toward multiple domains of social identities. Because of possible multiplicative effects of several biases affecting a single entity, this study suggests the importance of developing a tool in measuring intersectionality of biases.
 IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 005

Implicit Bias Toward Lesbian and Gay Persons Among Nursing Students: A Correlation Study

“…Race was not a predictor in the current study; however, this intersection was significant in the early study by Boysen and Vogel (2008), which found a positive correlation between negative implicit bias toward African Americans and LG persons. Though implicit racial bias has been studied (Kruse et al, 2022), the intersection of race and implicit bias toward LG persons is understudied (Ogungbe et al, 2019).…”

A scoping review of methodological approaches to detect bias in the electronic health record.

“…Efforts toward this goal will be most successful if interdisciplinary teams of health informatic specialists, behavioral scientists, clinicians, and health services researchers lead this work. Expanded use of intersectionality as an analytic tool is also needed to accurately characterize how biases interlock and identify the object of detected biases (Ogungbe et al, 2019). Health systems must be responsive to this work by investing in patient centered EHR systems and routine workplace trainings to reduce provider bias.…”

Cumulative Disadvantage and Disparities in Depression and Pain Among Veterans With Osteoarthritis: The Role of Perceived Discrimination

“…Notably, we assessed perceived discrimination using a measure that was not specific to the health care setting; thus, one should not assume that all the reported experiences occurred in the context of health care obtained from the VHA or in any other health care setting. Nonetheless, achieving health equity will necessitate that health care systems also address provider-and system-level factors that may contribute to health disparities, such as provider implicit bias and health care-related discrimination (48,49).…”