A systematic review of interventions to reduce HIV‐related stigma and discrimination from 2002 to 2013: how far have we come?

Abstract

IntroductionHIV-related stigma and discrimination continue to hamper efforts to prevent new infections and engage people in HIV treatment, care and support programmes. The identification of effective interventions to reduce stigma and discrimination that can be integrated into national responses is crucial to the success of the global AIDS response.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of studies and reports that assessed the effectiveness of interventions to reduce HIV stigma and discrimination between 1 January 2002 and 1 March 2013. Databases searched for peer-reviewed articles included PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO Host –CINAHL Plus, Psycinfo, Ovid, Sociofile and Popline. Reports were obtained from the www.HIVAIDSClearinghouse.eu, USAID Development Experience Clearinghouse, UNESCO HIV and AIDS Education Clearinghouse, Google, WHO and UNAIDS. Ancestry searches for articles included in the systematic review were also conducted. Studies of any design that sought to reduce stigma as a primary or secondary objective and included pre- and post-intervention measures of stigma were included.ResultsOf 2368 peer-reviewed articles and reports identified, 48 were included in our review representing 14 different target populations in 28 countries. The majority of interventions utilized two or more strategies to reduce stigma and discrimination, and ten included structural or biomedical components. However, most interventions targeted a single socio-ecological level and a single domain of stigma. Outcome measures lacked uniformity and validity, making both interpretation and comparison of study results difficult. While the majority of studies were effective at reducing the aspects of stigma they measured, none assessed the influence of stigma or discrimination reduction on HIV-related health outcomes.ConclusionsOur review revealed considerable progress in the stigma-reduction field. However, critical challenges and gaps remain which are impeding the identification of effective stigma-reduction strategies that can be implemented by national governments on a larger scale. The development, validation, and consistent use of globally relevant scales of stigma and discrimination are a critical next step for advancing the field of research in this area. Studies comparing the effectiveness of different stigma-reduction strategies and studies assessing the influence of stigma reduction on key behavioural and biomedical outcomes are also needed to maximize biomedical prevention efforts.

A Mixed-Methods Outcome Evaluation of a Mentorship Intervention for Canadian Nurses in HIV Care

“…Two recent systematic reviews explored the effect of interventions to reduce HIV stigma in HCP (Sengupta, Banks, Jonas, Miles, & Smith, 2011;Stangl, Lloyd, Brady, Holland, & Baral, 2013). Sengupta and colleagues (2011) noted that, of the 19 studies that met their inclusion criteria, 14 demonstrated effectiveness in reducing HIV stigma.…”

Implementation Process of a Canadian Community-based Nurse Mentorship Intervention in HIV Care

“…Despite extensive efforts in HIV education, HIV-related stigma still exists in health care (Shah, Heylen, Srinivasan, Perumpil, & Ekstrand, 2014). Since the first global review of interventions to reduce HIV-related stigma (Brown, Macintyre, & Trujillo, 2003), two additional systematic reviews have been conducted to evaluate the impact of interventions to increase HIV knowledge, decrease stigma, improve infection control practices, and increase willingness by HCP to treat PLWH (Sengupta, Banks, Jonas, Miles, & Smith, 2011;Stangl, Lloyd, Brady, Holland, & Baral, 2013). Sengupta and colleagues (2011) reviewed 19 studies, including four interventions to evaluate nurses' willingness to provide care for PLWH.…”

Overlapping HIV and sex-work stigma among female sex workers recruited to 14 respondent-driven sampling surveys across Zimbabwe, 2013

“…Internalised stigma affects individuals' self-esteem (Nam et al, 2008;Tsai et al, 2013), while experienced stigma relates to discrimination by others (Liu et al, 2011;Peitzmeier, Grosso, Bowes, Ceesay, & Baral, 2015). Growing availability of ART appears to have reduced HIV stigma (Campbell et al, 2011;Roura et al, 2009) alongside interventions to change public attitudes (Stangl, Lloyd, Brady, Holland, & Baral, 2013;Tsai et al, 2016).…”