2015
DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000001943
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Levels of Evidence in Auricular Defects Literature

Abstract: In the last 3 decades, the levels of evidence have increased significantly in external auricular defects literature. However, the predominant study remained levels IV and V.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review addressing microtia reconstruction in HFM patients. This is an especially important endeavor given the relatively low quality of evidence regarding auricular reconstruction 28 and the many persisting surgical challenges associated with this patient population. Eleven studies were included in this review, and these yielded 22 graded recommendations regarding the eight HFM-specific challenges identified (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review addressing microtia reconstruction in HFM patients. This is an especially important endeavor given the relatively low quality of evidence regarding auricular reconstruction 28 and the many persisting surgical challenges associated with this patient population. Eleven studies were included in this review, and these yielded 22 graded recommendations regarding the eight HFM-specific challenges identified (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%