A Systematic Review of Library Services Provision in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

Objective – Libraries have had to temporarily shut their doors because of the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in the provision of online and remote services. This review analyzed services offered by libraries, the technological tools used, and the challenges facing libraries during the pandemic. Methods – This study employed a systematic literature review, following the PRISMA checklist (Moher at al., 2009). The Building Blocks search strategy was employed to search for keywords of concepts in Library and Information Science Abstract (LISA), Library and Information Science Technology Abstract (LISTA), Library Science Database, Web of Science (WoS) core collections, and Google Scholar. A set of inclusion and exclusion criteria was pre-determined by the authors prior to database searching. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (Hong et al., 2018). A tabular approach was used to provide a summary of each article allowing the synthesis of results, which led to the identification of eight broad categories of services provided by libraries in included studies. Results – The first set of searches from the 5 databases produced 3,499 results. After we removed duplicates and applied the inclusion and exclusion criteria based on titles and abstracts, 37 potentially relevant articles were identified. Further screening of the full-text led to the final inclusion of 23 articles used for the qualitative synthesis. The majority of the studies were conducted in the United States of America (n= 6, 26.1%), followed by India (n=4, 17%), and China (n=2, 8.7%). The remaining studies were carried out in United Kingdom, Ireland, Canada, Mexico, Romania, Czech Republic, Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, Lesotho, and Zimbabwe. The most common method used in selected studies was the case study (n= 11, 48%), followed by survey (n=7, 30.4%), content analysis (n=4, 17.4%), and mixed methods (n=1, 4.3%). The majority of the studies were carried out in academic libraries (74%), while the rest were based on medical, public, and special libraries. Findings show that the majority of academic libraries in the included studies are providing and expanding access to electronic resources (n=16, 69.6%) and increasing open access resources and services (n=11, 47.8%). More so, most academic libraries are assisting in virtual education and teaching endeavors of faculty and students (n=13, 56.5%). In addition, some medical and public libraries are bolstering public health safety through health literacy (n=12, 52.2%), supporting research efforts, and engaging in virtual reference services, among others. In order to carry out these services, libraries are harnessing several educational, social networking, communication, and makerspaces technologies. Most of the libraries in the included studies reported budgetary challenges, and the need for new ICT infrastructure and Internet service as they move their services online. Conclusion – This review found that libraries are adapting in a number of ways to continue their roles in meeting patrons’ needs in spite of the growing challenges posed by COVID-19 restrictions and lockdown. For libraries to thrive in these trying times, there must be a well-structured approach to ensuring continuity of services. Libraries should prioritize the acquisition of electronic resources as well as increase their efforts to digitize resources that are only available in printed copies. As library services have predominantly shifted online, there should be concerted effort and support from government and funding agencies to equip libraries with the technological facilities needed to provide cutting-edge services. The quality assessment of the included studies shows that there is need for rigor and transparency in the methodological description of studies investigating library services provision in a pandemic. This review provides an overview of the ways libraries have responded to the challenges posed by a global pandemic, and hence will be of use and interest to all librarians especially those in health and academic sectors.

Understanding and Improving Older People’s Well-Being through Social Prescribing Involving the Cultural Sector: Interviews from a Realist Evaluation

“…Hence, insights we provide in this paper make a unique contribution to knowledge. However, there are papers on virtual delivery by museums ( Beauchet et al, 2022 ; Koebner et al, 2022 ), libraries ( Ayeni et al, 2022 ), and gardens ( Bettelli et al, 2019 ); they highlight that such provision can potentially increase accessibility and scalability, alongside improving well-being outcomes. A review of the literature on remotely delivered interventions for older people highlighted that change (or transformation) comes from active rather than passive consumption, with approaches that are adapted (tailored) to meet an individual’s needs and goals ( Gorenko et al, 2021 ).…”

Marginalized graduate students navigating the academy during the COVID-19 pandemic: A phenomenological approach

“…The literature has demonstrated how the pandemic challenged academic library users by creating barriers to physical resources, physical spaces, technology, and expertise (Ashiq et al, 2022;Mohan Tej, M et al, 2021), and how academic libraries responded to these pandemic-related challenges with new services and support (Ayeni et al, 2021;Eva, 2021;Howes et al, 2021;Vogus, 2021).…”

Library Services During COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Consequently, many of these academic units were quick to consider using advanced technologies to ensure access to information (Hamad et al, 2022;Dube & Jacobs, 2023). Among the adjustments made during the pandemic for the continuity of operations in academic libraries, the literature details nine categories of services: 1) virtual information literacy and teaching support; 2) research support; 3) website reorganization; identification of open resources through collaborative efforts; and the development of video tutorials; 4) provision of information and literacy on public health safety topics; 5) virtual reference; 6) remote access to bibliographic resources and the development of thematic guides; 7) wellness and self-care activities; 8) interlibrary loans and resource lending; and 9) digitization of information resources (Ashiq et al, 2023;Ayeni et al, 2021). These efforts demonstrate libraries' commitment to their communities and validate their importance in supporting distance education and other activities related to research, learning, and teaching.…”