2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jve.2022.100085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of limiting antigen avidity enzyme immunoassay for detection of recent HIV-1 infection to expand supported applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most laboratory tests that distinguish between recent and longstanding HIV-1 infection rely on the well-characterized evolution of the humoral antibody (Ab) response to HIV infection and are reviewed elsewhere. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] One important challenge to the interpretation of tests for recent infection is the inherent biological variability in the kinetics of Ab maturation during infection between individuals; this can be influenced by particular host, viral, and external characteristics, including sex, pregnancy status, HIV-1 subtype, ART status, etc. Therefore, recent infection testing performed for the purpose of estimating incidence in a population requires a probabilistic approach, based on the test performance described by two key parameters: the mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) and false recency ratio (FRR; sometimes referred to as the false recent rate, or proportion false recent).…”
Section: Differentiating Between Recent and Chronic Hiv Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most laboratory tests that distinguish between recent and longstanding HIV-1 infection rely on the well-characterized evolution of the humoral antibody (Ab) response to HIV infection and are reviewed elsewhere. [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] One important challenge to the interpretation of tests for recent infection is the inherent biological variability in the kinetics of Ab maturation during infection between individuals; this can be influenced by particular host, viral, and external characteristics, including sex, pregnancy status, HIV-1 subtype, ART status, etc. Therefore, recent infection testing performed for the purpose of estimating incidence in a population requires a probabilistic approach, based on the test performance described by two key parameters: the mean duration of recent infection (MDRI) and false recency ratio (FRR; sometimes referred to as the false recent rate, or proportion false recent).…”
Section: Differentiating Between Recent and Chronic Hiv Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most laboratory tests that distinguish between recent and longstanding HIV‐1 infection rely on the well‐characterized evolution of the humoral antibody (Ab) response to HIV infection and are reviewed elsewhere 31–39 …”
Section: Differentiating Between Recent and Chronic Hiv Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human immunodeficiency virus type one (HIV-1) is an important agent that is responsible for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS): approximately 38 million people globally live with this virus, and nearly 650,000 people died from AIDS-related illnesses in 2021, according to the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) ( Bernstein and Wegman, 2018 ; Eisinger and Fauci, 2018 ; UNAIDS, 2022 ). HIV-1 infection remains a global public health concern, the UNAIDS initiated the global project termed “95-95-95” to end the global HIV/AIDS epidemic by 2030, stressing the importance of diagnostic tests and aiming for 95% of people living with HIV-1 to know their status, 95% of people with diagnosed HIV-1 infection to receive sustained treatment, and 95% of people on treatment to achieve viral load suppression ( Rojas-Celis et al, 2019 ; Kin-On et al, 2022 ). Developing an advanced testing system is crucial to meet these goals and timely control the transmission of the disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, HIV incidence among high-risk groups from AIDS surveillance sentinels is calculated in a province to reduce bias (12). LAg-Avidity-EIA has been widely used in many countries, especially in developing countries, to estimate HIV incidence in high-risk populations (13)(14)(15)(16). In this study, the LAg-Avidity-EIA method was used to detect recent HIV infections in AIDS sentinel surveillance surveys in Jiangsu province from 2016 to 2021 to observe the trends of HIV incidence and to determine the factors associated with recent HIV infection among MSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%