A systematic review of measures used in studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptability

Allen, Jennifer D.; Coronado, Gloria D.; Williams, Rebecca S.; Glenn, Beth A.; Escoffery, Cam; Fernández, María E.; Tuff, Raegan A.; Wilson, Katherine; Mullen, Patricia Dolan

doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.03.063

Cited by 108 publications

(96 citation statements)

References 109 publications

(359 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The HBM has been used in numerous studies examining HPV vaccine decision-making. [38][39][40] Two frames were developed: one for the parents who accepted the vaccine and one for the parents who refused the vaccine. The HBM proposes that the likelihood that a certain health behavior will be adopted is influenced by 5 key constructs: perceived susceptibility to the disease, perceived severity of the disease, benefits and barriers of performing the behavior, and cues to action which is defined as any external source (e.g., doctor recommendation, media reports) that have the potential to instigate the behavior in question.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: II. Qualitative results

Krawczyk

Perez

King

et al. 2015

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The goal of the study was to examine the reasons given by parents who accepted or refused the HPV vaccine for their daughters in the context of a free provincial school-based vaccination program. A random sample of parents of 9-10 y old girls completed a mail-in questionnaire. Parents' responses to 2 open-ended questions were assessed using content analysis. Coding themes were derived from the Health Belief Model. 806 parents returned and answered the relevant items. 88% of these parents decided to vaccinate their daughter. The primary reasons for parents' acceptance was the perceived benefits (e.g., health protection, cancer/HPV prevention) and cues to action (e.g., physician recommendation, trusting the school vaccine program). Reasons for parental refusal included barriers (e.g., fear of side effects) and low susceptibility (e.g., their daughter is not at risk). Both groups of parents had unanswered questions, doubts and often inaccurate information. This study provides unique insight into parents' perspectives concerning the decision making process for their daughter. There appears to be a need for accurate and complete information to assure informed HPV vaccine decision-making by parents and to increase HPV vaccine uptake.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: II. Qualitative results

Krawczyk

Perez

King

et al. 2015

Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A number of studies in Vietnam and other Asian countries have reported low levels of knowledge about cervical cancer, HPV, and HPV vaccines (Loi & Nhung, 2004;Dinh et al, 2007;Nghi et al, 2010;Young et al, 2010;Charakorn et al, 2011). These and other HPV vaccine acceptability studies have assessed knowledge and vaccine intentions before HPV vaccine availability (Allen et al, 2010). Although some studies have reported little or no relationship between HPV knowledge and vaccine acceptance, there is a belief cervical cancer, HPV infection, and HPV vaccines among parents and girls exposed to an education campaign as part of the HPV vaccine demonstration project conducted in Vietnam, to compare the knowledge of these areas between mothers and daughters, and to explore whether knowledge was associated with vaccination status.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge of Cervical Cancer and HPV Vaccine Post-Vaccination among Mothers and Daughters in Vietnam

Paul¹,

LaMontagne²,

Nt³

2012

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Limited human papillomavirus (HPV) related knowledge might be a barrier to future vaccine acceptance. From 2008-2010, PATH conducted an HPV vaccination demonstration project in partnership with the government immunization program in Vietnam, which included awareness campaigns prior to vaccination. Objective: To assess and compare knowledge and attitudes about cervical cancer and HPV vaccines between mothers and daughters, and whether knowledge was associated with vaccination status. Methods: We analyzed HPV-related knowledge and attitude data from mother-daughter paired responses to a cross-sectional household survey. After parents completed the survey, daughters were asked the same questions. We calculated the frequency of responses for each question and devised a scaled composite measure for knowledge. Results: Participants believed they had received enough information about cervical cancer and HPV vaccines and it was sufficient to make a decision about vaccination. Fifty percent of the participants knew HPV causes cervical cancer and 80% knew the HPV vaccine prevented cervical cancer. Mothers had more knowledge about cervical cancer and HPV infection (p<0.01), compared to daughters, who had more vaccine specific knowledge (p<0.01). However, the total mean knowledge score was similar for the groups. Girls not fully vaccinated had a lower mean knowledge score than fully vaccinated girls (p<0.001). Conclusions: Our results suggest that the purpose of the HPV vaccine was clearly messaged; however, some misconceptions about cervical cancer and HPV still exist. Limited knowledge about the magnitude of cervical cancer, HPV as a cause of cervical cancer, and HPV vaccines may have contributed to incomplete vaccination.

show abstract

“…Together, the two strains are known to cause approximately 70% of all cervical cancer cases worldwide and some other genital cancers. Gardasil also protects against the two HPV types (HPV-6 and HPV-11) that cause 90% of genital warts [62]. In UK, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization recommended routine vaccination for 11 to 12-year olds, including the possibility of a catchup campaign but only up to the age of 16.…”

Section: Hpv Vaccinementioning

confidence: 99%

Human Papillomavirus and Carcinogenesis in the Upper Aero-Digestive Tract

Castillo¹

2013

Carcinogenesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review of measures used in studies of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine acceptability

Cited by 108 publications

References 109 publications

Parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: II. Qualitative results

Parents’ decision-making about the human papillomavirus vaccine for their daughters: II. Qualitative results

Knowledge of Cervical Cancer and HPV Vaccine Post-Vaccination among Mothers and Daughters in Vietnam

Human Papillomavirus and Carcinogenesis in the Upper Aero-Digestive Tract

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About