2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
207
1
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(237 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
2
207
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…50 A recent systematic review identified large differences in the volume of healthcare between countries, regions, hospitals as well as individual healthcare providers. 51 This may be caused by potential shortfalls in 3 areas: underuse of effective care, misuse in preference-sensitive care, and overuse of supplysensitive care. Several remedies have been described to reduce unwarranted variation, such as the implementation of clinical practice guidelines to stimulate evidence-based practice, increasing the role of patients in shared decision-making to optimize preference-sensitive care, and regulating resource capacity in the healthcare system to reduce supply-sensitive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 A recent systematic review identified large differences in the volume of healthcare between countries, regions, hospitals as well as individual healthcare providers. 51 This may be caused by potential shortfalls in 3 areas: underuse of effective care, misuse in preference-sensitive care, and overuse of supplysensitive care. Several remedies have been described to reduce unwarranted variation, such as the implementation of clinical practice guidelines to stimulate evidence-based practice, increasing the role of patients in shared decision-making to optimize preference-sensitive care, and regulating resource capacity in the healthcare system to reduce supply-sensitive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the US substantial geographic variation in utilization of services has been attributed to a feefor-service based reimbursement system that incentivizes over-utilization, lack of use of informed patient decisionmaking, and lack of consensus around acceptable practices [1][2][3][4]. Explanation of geographic variation in a variety of healthcare services in other OECD countries has been inconsistent [5]. However, France has been found to demonstrate less geographic variation than the US or UK in per-capita utilization rates of common elective surgical procedures [6]; the lower variation was attributed, in part, to greater centralized planning of hospital capacity in France.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to control by management or to market incentives peer control is probably weaker and allows more deviance. For example, medical literature has always documented large and irrational variations in medical practice across regions, hospitals and physician practices for almost every condition and procedure [16]. Self-regulation by professional communities is sometimes considered an inefficient result of power dynamics among professional groups and the wider society.…”
Section: Professional Control Professional Development and Non-hieramentioning
confidence: 99%