2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0627-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of methods to measure menstrual blood loss

Abstract: BackgroundSince the publication over 50 years ago of the alkaline hematin method for quantifying menstrual blood loss (MBL) many new approaches have been developed to assess MBL. The aim of this systematic review is to determine for methods of measuring MBL: ability to distinguish between normal and heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); practicalities and limitations in the research setting; and suitability for diagnosing HMB in routine clinical practice.MethodsEmbase®™, MEDLINE®, and ClinicalTrials.gov were screene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the body of evidence suggesting that NSAIDs treat menstrual blood loss among Cu-IUD users, the variation by which menstrual blood loss is measured makes comparisons with our ndings di cult [28]. Most prior studies used an objective measure of menstrual blood loss, which requires the burdensome task of study participants saving their used sanitary pads and transporting them back to the research team for processing by alkaline hematin technique [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Despite the body of evidence suggesting that NSAIDs treat menstrual blood loss among Cu-IUD users, the variation by which menstrual blood loss is measured makes comparisons with our ndings di cult [28]. Most prior studies used an objective measure of menstrual blood loss, which requires the burdensome task of study participants saving their used sanitary pads and transporting them back to the research team for processing by alkaline hematin technique [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The Higham chart is based on the number of sanitary pads consumed along with the amount of blood absorbed onto per cc. The Higham chart is considered one of the most useful, valid, and reliable measures for vaginal bleeding;[ 12 ] and (iii) assessment of the complications of the drugs namely nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, low abdominal pain, headache, chills, and fever evaluated within the first 24 h of treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PBAC score greater than 100 signi ies that menstrual blood loss is greater than 80ml (Srivaths et al, 2015;Rani et al, 2016;Hymavathi et al, 2018). This scoring system is not equivalent but is proportional to MBL (Magnay et al, 2018).…”
Section: Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%