A Systematic Review of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning Research Trends and Practices in Malaysia

Abstract

Mobile technology integration in Malaysia’s English language education has a bright future, owing to the many advantages offered by mobile devices. However, there are inadequate studies that systematically review existing work in Malaysia to uncover gaps in the use of mobile technologies for English teaching and learning. Thus, a systematic review was conducted to offer an up-to-date synthesis of Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) integration in Malaysia from January 2019 to January 2021. The review followed the PRISMA Statement's guidelines which resulted in the identification of eleven articles that met all the inclusion criteria. Following that, the eleven articles were analysed and synthesised quantitatively and qualitatively using seven codes derived from two earlier systematic reviews of the literature. The codes were: (1) research objectives, (2) research methodologies, (3) educational level, (4) learning context, (5) device types, (6) theories, and (7) research outcomes. The systematic review discovered several significant findings, including the fact that the majority of the studies examined the effect of MALL integration on students' English acquisition and performance, and that MALL was more prevalent in Malaysian higher education institutions than other levels of education, with the lowest prevalence in primary schools. In light of this information, recommendations for future research were proposed. Malaysian academics are encouraged to broaden the scope of their future research and engage students from all levels of education in future MALL practices in order to better understand MALL's usability in English language instruction in Malaysia.

A Systematic Review of the Design of Augmented Reality Applications for Young Children

“…The second criterion was the timeline, which was within 2011-2020 (a span of 10 years), that essentially helped the researchers to focus on relevant and recent articles on Augmented Reality research, which also helped highlight the evolution of such a novel technology. In addition, [33] stated that it is very impossible for researchers to evaluate all published articles; as a result, researchers should determine the time period within which they will analyse and submit their review findings properly.…”

A Systematic Review of Mobile Learning Trends in Supporting the Mastery of Spelling

“…Mobile learning is part of Mobile-assisted Language Learning (MALL) that has advanced with a growing number of studies that explore its various uses, both in and out of formal language classes [11], [12], [8]. Interestingly, mobile learning constitutes the prominent and popular form of 21st century student-centered learning applications worldwide [13].…”

“…It is essential to determine the emphasis on any particular education levels of the respondents in language-related educational studies, as suggested by [8] to observe their differential implications, particularly in relation to this review. Besides, the respondents involved in the studies are sometimes not explicitly acknowledged as users of mobile learning platforms.…”

“…Besides, the respondents involved in the studies are sometimes not explicitly acknowledged as users of mobile learning platforms. [8] postulated that it is important to gain deeper insights into the role of the teachers and students in simultaneously recognizing mobile learning trends in supporting the mastery of spelling.…”

Virtual Versus Physical Code-Switching in English Language Classrooms

“…They have been reading and writing in digital format which could allow them to enhance new literate skills and abilities to learn content concepts. It has been, also, reported that young adults could perform academic task better if they learnt through the internet, meaning that acquiring knowledge in a formal classroom will be less likely effective than that of conducting in the virtual classroom [2]. The youth report also shared the feeling of not being up to date from academic learning when teachers failed to spend their funds of knowledge of digital literacies [3].…”