2021
DOI: 10.1177/08901171211013281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Multi-Component Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) Interventions

Abstract: Objective: To identify, review, and describe multicomponent physical activity (PA) interventions in terms of: (a) number and combination of Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) components, (b) study characteristics, and (c) primary outcomes. Data Source: Five electronic databases (i.e., PubMed, PsychInfo, Physical Education Index, Sport Discus, and ERIC). Study Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria: Included articles were peer-reviewed, written in English language, published since 1987, and includ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past decade, the Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) has been widely accepted and applied to school health practice. The idea of CSPAP is to provide students with adequate PA opportunities by means of a multi-component approach before, during, and after school hours ( Pulling Kuhn et al, 2021 ). Quality PE is the foundation of the program, along with the other four components, namely, PA during school, PA before and after school, family and community engagement, and staff involvement ( Erwin et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past decade, the Comprehensive School Physical Activity Program (CSPAP) has been widely accepted and applied to school health practice. The idea of CSPAP is to provide students with adequate PA opportunities by means of a multi-component approach before, during, and after school hours ( Pulling Kuhn et al, 2021 ). Quality PE is the foundation of the program, along with the other four components, namely, PA during school, PA before and after school, family and community engagement, and staff involvement ( Erwin et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a recent systematic review that considered 32 school-based physical activity studies, most included physical education plus one or two additional components (e.g., physical activity before or after school), while fewer (eight) included physical education and three additional whole-school components. Only one study included all five CSPAP components [4]. Despite the variability in the types of initiatives/interventions, it appears that multicomponent, whole-school approaches to physical activity promotion can result in positive outcomes for youth [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study included all five CSPAP components [4]. Despite the variability in the types of initiatives/interventions, it appears that multicomponent, whole-school approaches to physical activity promotion can result in positive outcomes for youth [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comprehensive School Physical Activity Programs (CSPAP) have the potential to reverse obesogenic trends by engaging multiple partners through five points of intervention: (a) physical education, (b) during the school day PA (e.g., recess, classroom PA), (c) staff involvement, (d) before-and afterschool PA, and (e) community engagement (Ploeg et al, 2014;Burns et al, 2015;Pulling Kuhn et al, 2021). Given the multiplicity of models like CSPAP, there are natural barriers to their integration (Bates et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If successful, school-university collaborations address the potential shortcomings in teacher education or inexperience. The bidirectional relationships between schools and universities are well-intended, but few studies have examined the effects of school-based PA interventions on behavior using an integrative community-based participatory approach (Hogan et al, 2014;Wallace, 2019;Pulling Kuhn et al, 2021). Further, despite community engagement being included in the CSPAP, there is a paucity of research related to the role of community organizations in the promotion of PA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%