A systematic review of patient prioritization tools in non-emergency healthcare services

Abstract

Background Patient prioritization is a strategy used to manage access to healthcare services. Patient prioritization tools (PPT) contribute to supporting the prioritization decision process, and to its transparency and fairness. Patient prioritization tools can take various forms and are highly dependent on the particular context of application. Consequently, the sets of criteria change from one context to another, especially when used in non-emergency settings. This paper systematically synthesizes and analyzes the published evidence concerning the development and challenges related to the validation and implementation of PPTs in non-emergency settings. Methods We conducted a systematic mixed studies review. We searched evidence in five databases to select articles based on eligibility criteria, and information of included articles was extracted using an extraction grid. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed by using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The article selection process, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed by at least two reviewers independently. Results We included 48 studies listing 34 different patient prioritization tools. Most of them are designed for managing access to elective surgeries in hospital settings. Two-thirds of the tools were investigated based on reliability or validity. Inconclusive results were found regarding the impact of PPTs on patient waiting times. Advantages associated with PPT use were found mostly in relationship to acceptability of the tools by clinicians and increased transparency and equity for patients. Conclusions This review describes the development and validation processes of PPTs used in non-urgent healthcare settings. Despite the large number of PPTs studied, implementation into clinical practice seems to be an open challenge. Based on the findings of this review, recommendations are proposed to develop, validate, and implement such tools in clinical settings. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42018107205

The impact of referral letter quality on timely access to specialised mental health care: a quantitative study of the reliability of patient triage

“…The reliability of specialist mental health care’s triage based on referral information, and the risk of under- and overestimation, as found in the current study, have been debated for many years [ 9 , 10 ]. Under- or overestimation of the urgency of patients’ need when decisions are based on referral information has been highlighted previously [ 9 , 10 ] and measures to improve reliability of triage decisions have been implemented [ 11 ]. In a similar setting to the present study, Holman and colleagues reported low interrater reliability for priority setting between local mental health centres, using vignettes of referral letters [ 2 ].…”

“…Standardising triage decisions has been deemed necessary for correct assessment of treatment need [ 10 ]. Context-specific tools have been developed for assessing the urgency of treatment need to improve patient prioritisation [ 11 ]. A recent review of patient prioritisation tools for elective care indicated that 50% of the prioritisation tools that had been tested for reliability were categorised as acceptable to good [ 11 ].…”

A Multi-Faceted Strategy for Evidence Translation Reduces Healthcare Waiting Time: A Mixed Methods Study Using the RE-AIM Framework

“…The RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) framework was used to guide evaluation of the knowledge translation strategy (18). Data were collected from two sources to inform each of the elements ( Table 1): (1) internally collected data from workshop attendance lists and CoP mailing list; (2) a cross-sectional survey of participants in the workshop series and service providers who requested to join the CoP mailing list. All participants who attended the workshops and people on the CoP mailing list were sent an email with an invitation to complete a short online survey.…”

Strategies to reduce waiting times in outpatient rehabilitation services for adults with physical disabilities: A systematic literature review

“…1(p4) Long waiting times are one of the main barriers to access experienced by patients in different health care sectors, including medical and paramedical services. 2,3 In health care, the concept of waiting can be expressed in different ways, but is most commonly measured as the time elapsed between referral for a service and first appointment. 4,5…”

“…1(p4) Long waiting times are one of the main barriers to access experienced by patients in different health care sectors, including medical and paramedical services. 2,3 In health care, the concept of waiting can be expressed in different ways, but is most commonly measured as the time elapsed between referral for a service and first appointment. 4,5 Findings to date have highlighted major gaps and disparities in access to publicly funded outpatient rehabilitation services in several countries, such as Canada, the United Kingdom (UK) and Australia.…”