2009
DOI: 10.3310/hta13260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of presumed consent systems for deceased organ donation

Abstract: How to obtain copies of this and other HTA programme reports An electronic version of this publication, in Adobe Acrobat format, is available for downloading free of charge for personal use from the HTA website (www.hta.ac.uk). A fully searchable CD-ROM is also available (see below).Printed copies of HTA monographs cost £20 each (post and packing free in the UK) to both public and private sector purchasers from our Despatch Agents.Non-UK purchasers will have to pay a small fee for post and packing. For Europea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
1
59
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Explicit consent countries (also known as "informed consent" or "opt-in") are those without presumed consent legislation. It is noteworthy that based upon the information received from our questionnaires we defined both Norway and Israel as explicit consent countries, which conflicts with data from previous studies 14,15 . Predominant religion of each country was defined using the sources indicated in Table 1b and grouped into the following categories: Catholic; Protestant; Orthodox (Christian); Jewish; Muslim and Eastern.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Explicit consent countries (also known as "informed consent" or "opt-in") are those without presumed consent legislation. It is noteworthy that based upon the information received from our questionnaires we defined both Norway and Israel as explicit consent countries, which conflicts with data from previous studies 14,15 . Predominant religion of each country was defined using the sources indicated in Table 1b and grouped into the following categories: Catholic; Protestant; Orthodox (Christian); Jewish; Muslim and Eastern.…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…However, due to the overall scarcity of donor organs and uncertain outcome its value has been questioned. One explanation for our high re-transplant rate might be the donor legislation in Austria (presumed consent system), leading to a comparable good organ supply [15]. Overall, numbers of paediatric re-transplantations are low, with only 74 paediatric transplantations performed worldwide since 1994 [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing academic interest in this subject (Johnson and Goldstein, 2003;Abadie and Gay, 2006;Rithalia et al 2009) but no large scale experimental research that we are aware of examining outcomes of different organ donation defaults. Thaler and Sunstein (2008) identify organ donation as a case where defaults can be manipulated to achieve a change in behaviour at societal level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%