A systematic review of psychometric testing of instruments that measure intention to work with older people

Chin, Chong; Hairi, Noran Naqiah; Chong, Mei Chan

doi:10.1111/jan.13265

Cited by 7 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 62 publications

(154 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…COnsensus‐based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology provides a rigorous and structured guidance to conduct high‐quality psychometric reviews of health measurement instruments. That is why this methodology is being used in several psychometric reviews (Che, Hairi, & Chong, ; Davies, Waters, & Marshall, ; Elf, Nordin, Wijk, & McKee, ; Matarese et al., ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Instruments to assess self‐care among healthy children: A systematic review of measurement properties

Urpí-Fernández

Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo

Montes-Hidalgo

et al. 2017

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Instruments to assess self‐care among healthy children: A systematic review of measurement properties

Urpí-Fernández

Zabaleta‐del‐Olmo

Montes-Hidalgo

et al. 2017

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The reliability and validity of an instrument can be tested using various measures (Mokkink et al, 2010). Its reliability is often based on internal consistency and test-retest correlations, whereas its validity is determined by content validity and construct validity (Che et al, 2017). This process can be done through monolingual or bilingual testing (Sperber, 2004).…”

Section: Translation and Validationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Korean Version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire

Lee

Sohng

2020

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Given the increase in cross-cultural studies, there is a need for adequately translated and validated study instruments. Using instruments translated into participants’ native language can lower barriers to study participation and increase study validity. The purpose of this study was to describe the translation and validation processes of the Korean version (MDQ-K) of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire (MDQ). The MDQ was translated into Korean through a forward-and-backward translation process, followed by expert review and pilot testing among 100 bilingual Korean students. The equivalence of MDQ-K to MDQ was tested through bivariate Pearson’s correlations and paired t tests. The psychometric properties of the MDQ-K were evaluated through internal consistency and construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis). The reliability of the questionnaire was good (Cronbach’s α = .96). The results of confirmatory factor analysis revealed an acceptable model fit to the data. Overall, the MDQ-K demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, although paired t tests found significant differences ( p < .05) between the MDQ and MDQ-K in the means of three items: “restlessness” (Item 22), “bursts of energy and activity” (Item 40), and “blind spots and fuzzy vision” (Item 46). Possible explanations for these discrepancies include the participants’ varying English proficiency levels, issues with understanding medical terminology, and absence of words with the same meanings in different languages. We also discussed possible deletion of questionnaire items through further factor analysis.

show abstract

Assessing attitudes and intention to work with older adults by American and Israeli nursing students: Adapting and testing a measure

Zisberg

Shulyaev

Son

2021

Nurse Education Today

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A systematic review of psychometric testing of instruments that measure intention to work with older people

Abstract: No single instrument was found to be optimal for use. Studies of high methodological quality are needed to properly assess the measurement properties of the instruments that are currently available. Until such studies are available, we recommend using existing instruments with caution.

Cited by 7 publications

References 62 publications

Instruments to assess self‐care among healthy children: A systematic review of measurement properties

Instruments to assess self‐care among healthy children: A systematic review of measurement properties

Translation and Cross-Cultural Validation of Korean Version of the Menstrual Distress Questionnaire

Assessing attitudes and intention to work with older adults by American and Israeli nursing students: Adapting and testing a measure

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About