A systematic review of questionnaires about patient’s values and preferences in clinical practice guidelines

Abstract

ObjectiveWe conducted a systematic review to evaluate questionnaires about patient’s values and preferences to provide information on the most appropriate questionnaires to be used when developing clinical practice guidelines.MethodsA systematic literature search of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and the Wanfang Database was performed to identify studies on questionnaires evaluating patient’s values and preferences. The articles that used fully structured questionnaires or scales with standardized questions and answer options were included. We assessed the questionnaires’ construction and content with a psychometric methodology and summarized the domains and items about patient’s preferences and values.ResultsA total of 7,008 records were retrieved by the search strategy and scanned, and 20 articles were finally included. Of these, 10 (50%) articles described the process of item generation and only four questionnaires (20%, 4/20) mentioned the pilot testing. Regarding “validity”, seven questionnaires (35%, 7/20) assessed validity and only one (5%, 1/20) questionnaire assessed internal consistency, with Cornbrash’s α values of 0.74–0.87. For “acceptability”, the time to complete the questionnaires ranged from 10 to 30 minutes and only nine studies (45%, 9/20) reported the response rates. In addition, the results of domains and items about patient’s preferences and values showed that the “effectiveness” domain was the most considered item in the patient’s value questionnaire followed by “safety”, “prognosis”, and others, whereas the least considered domain was “physician’s experience”.ConclusionOnly a few studies have developed questionnaires with rigorous psychometric methods to measure patient’s preferences and values. Currently, still there is no valid or reliable questionnaire for patient’s preferences and values for use when developing clinical practice guidelines. Further study should be conducted to develop standardized instruments to measure patient’s preferences and values. This study provides the domains and items that may be used in formulating questionnaires about patient’s preferences and values.

Are Veterans Getting Their Preferred Depression Treatment? A National Observational Study in the Veterans Health Administration

“…First, patient treatment preferences are complex and may not have been fully captured in the scales used here even though similar visual analog scales have been used in prior research on treatment preferences. 27,42 Second, preferences were assessed an average of 1 week after initiating treatment. Patient preferences prior to that time might have been somewhat different.…”

Assessing Patient Preferences for Treatment Options for Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A Critical Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies

“…The development of patient preference survey questionnaires should follow a psychometric approach, ensuring item generation, pretest and pilot testing, and systematic testing of validity, reliability, and acceptability. 25 Survey methodology is limited because few questionnaires meet the standards of psychometric methods and that many studies may not be adequately powered to answer the study question. Further, the results of a survey study may also be influenced by its contents, mode of administration, the burden of administration, the research setting, and the medical literacy of the populations surveyed.…”

Efficacy and safety of phytoestrogens in the treatment of perimenopausal and postmenopausal depressive disorders: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…13 Nowadays, women are preferring to choose treatments with herbal medicine rather than exposing themselves to the risks associated with HRT. 3,14 Researchers have proposed that phytoestrogens, which are compounds extracted from plants 15 can be used as an alternative approach to treating post-menopausal depression, without the risks associated with taking oestrogens. 16 There are two main types of phytoestrogens: isoflavones and lignans.…”