A systematic review of regulatory and educational interventions to reduce the burden associated with the prescriptions of sedative-hypnotics in adults treated for sleep disorders

Abstract

BackgroundThe burden of Sedative-Hypnotics (SHs) has been known since the 1980s. Yet, their consumption remains high. A systematic review of the literature should help to assess efficient interventions to improve the appropriate use of SHs in sleep disorders.ObjectivesTo identify and assess regulatory and educational interventions designed to improve the appropriate use of SHs for insomnia treatment.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review of the literature according to PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search covering the period 1980–2015 was carried out in Medline, Web of Science, Embase and PsycInfo. We included studies reporting the implementation of regulatory or educational strategies directed towards patients and/or healthcare professionals to improve the appropriate use of SHs to treat insomnia in the community, hospitals and nursing homes.ResultsThirty-one studies were included: 23 assessed educational interventions (recommendations by mail/email, computer alerts, meetings, mass media campaigns, prescription profile), 8 assessed regulatory interventions (prescription rule restriction, end of reimbursement). The most recent was implemented in 2009. Restrictive prescription rules were effective to reduce the consumption of targeted SHs but led to a switch to other non-recommended SHs. Among educational interventions, only 3 studies out of 7 reported positive results of mono-faceted interventions; whereas, 13 out of the 16 multi-faceted interventions were reported as efficient: particularly, the active involvement of healthcare professionals and patients and the spread of information through mass media were successful. The risk of bias was high for 24 studies (mainly due to the design), moderate for 3 studies and weak for 4 studies.ConclusionEducational multifaceted studies are presented as the most efficient. But further better designed studies are needed to make evidence-based results more generalizable.

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication use in older drivers

“…The PIMs most commonly used by older drivers are benzodiazepines, nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics, antidepressants, and first-generation antihistamines, all of which have been linked to driving impairment and increased crash risk. Implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as computer-based alerts and prescription rule restrictions [38], may reduce PIM use and improve health outcomes and driving safety in older adults.…”

A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and/ mental health outcomes of survivors

“…Quantitative studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for quantitative studies developed by the Effective Public Health Practice Project, see Table 3 for an overview of the components of this tool [12]. This tool had been used in another systematic review focused on interventions [13]. Qualitative studies were assessed, using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Qualitative Research Checklist [14], the main components focused on assessing the methodological limitations, coherence, adequacy of data and relevance of research.…”

Sleep-Aids Derived from Natural Products

“…For instance, insomnia patients with GABA in the occipital cortex has been reported to be consistent with the hyperarousal model of insomnia. In addition, emotional and cognitive systems lead to suppression of sleep-promoting regions such as the ventrolateral preoptic area (VLPO) ( Wang and Liu, 2016 ; Bourcier et al ., 2018 ). In addition, orexin/hypocretin neurons of the lateral hypothalamus project to all of the sleep/insomnia arousal-promoting centers in the brainstem and hypothalamus thereby reinforcing their activity to play on important roles in sleep.…”