2017
DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2017.31.4487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of Secondary Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks

Abstract: The rate of secondary CSF leaks was low due to advances in endoscopic repair techniques. Spontaneous and iatrogenic CSF leaks were more likely to recur, especially without adequate control of underlying factors, such as increased intracranial pressure and obesity. Further studies with consistent reporting are required for more definitive conclusions about secondary CSF leaks.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
(913 reference statements)
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, a multilayer reconstruction was performed, which included a collagen matrix laid against the dura mater as the first layer, bone pile fitted into the bone as the second layer, and a pedicle nasoseptal flap covering the bone as the third layer. Previously, for small defects, only soft reconstruction was performed with fascia or fat and rigid reconstruction was not recommended [7][8][9] . However, since spontaneous CSF leakage is related to chronic intracranial hypertension [2][3][4][5][6] , a strong reconstruction is preferable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a multilayer reconstruction was performed, which included a collagen matrix laid against the dura mater as the first layer, bone pile fitted into the bone as the second layer, and a pedicle nasoseptal flap covering the bone as the third layer. Previously, for small defects, only soft reconstruction was performed with fascia or fat and rigid reconstruction was not recommended [7][8][9] . However, since spontaneous CSF leakage is related to chronic intracranial hypertension [2][3][4][5][6] , a strong reconstruction is preferable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, repair failures in both groups are low in number and within the range of previously published studies. 17 Another limitation is selection bias—a single experienced tertiary care surgeon performed all the MTP leak repairs. The data likely reflect a learning curve and refinement of technique.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite various techniques reported for multilayer reconstruction of the skull base, small defects are typically reconstructed using fat or fascia, while rigid reconstruction has not been reported. 7 , 8 , 9 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%