2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of selected evidence on improving knowledge and skills through high-fidelity simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
75
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
75
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[42] In that we found a significant difference (p < .05) between the two, active participation would seem useful with regard to passing the preclinical test. These results are in keeping with other international simulation nursing studies that find that high-fidelity simulation enhances scores on both knowledge and skills exams [43] and leads to higher knowledge scores. [44] Cant and Cooper [38] described twelve studies that used an experimental or quasi-experimental design, all of which all found simulation to be a valid teaching/learning strategy; gains in knowledge, critical thinking, ability, satisfaction and competence were also seen in half of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[42] In that we found a significant difference (p < .05) between the two, active participation would seem useful with regard to passing the preclinical test. These results are in keeping with other international simulation nursing studies that find that high-fidelity simulation enhances scores on both knowledge and skills exams [43] and leads to higher knowledge scores. [44] Cant and Cooper [38] described twelve studies that used an experimental or quasi-experimental design, all of which all found simulation to be a valid teaching/learning strategy; gains in knowledge, critical thinking, ability, satisfaction and competence were also seen in half of these studies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Yuan et al [43] concluded that it is necessary to conduct more high quality randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes to determine the effect of high-fidelity simulation on students' performance. We accordingly agree that further studies are needed to develop students' possibilities to participate in and/or observe simulation scenarios with a computerized simulation manikin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic review on current empirical studies (between 2000 and 2011) indicated the high-fidelity simulation did enhance scores on knowledge and skill exams but provided a mixed contribution to self-confidence and competency [7,8] . Based on self-report surveys, many Chinese students perceived that simulation effectively improved their abilities in communication, team collaboration, clinical thinking, clinical judgment and problem solving [9,10] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited clinical placements affect and dilute real clinical ex-D. M. Dennis et al 879 periences (Yuan, Williams, Fang, & Ye, 2012) and result in fewer opportunities to learn the skills required, less supervision (Keller, 1979;Maran & Glavin, 2003), a reduction in clinical learning experiences and consequently clinical competence (Murray et al, 2007). Simulation based learning (SBL) consists of both a "hands-on" experience of a mock-clinical event or situation and a debrief session of reflection and feedback (Shinnick, Woo, & Mentes, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%