2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2017.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of sensory-based autism subtypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early treatment is advantageous given younger children's greater neuronal plasticity, which may contribute to improving outcomes [ 39 41 ]. Indeed, several studies have provided sufficient evidence in support of interventions targeting ASD [ 42 ], including behavioral interventions [ 43 ], the cognitive behavioral intervention package, language training, modeling, parent training [ 44 ], and the peer training package [ 42 ]. To date, there is no single guideline on how best to support children with sensory features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early treatment is advantageous given younger children's greater neuronal plasticity, which may contribute to improving outcomes [ 39 41 ]. Indeed, several studies have provided sufficient evidence in support of interventions targeting ASD [ 42 ], including behavioral interventions [ 43 ], the cognitive behavioral intervention package, language training, modeling, parent training [ 44 ], and the peer training package [ 42 ]. To date, there is no single guideline on how best to support children with sensory features.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, subtyping of sensory profiles has received limited attention in the research literature. A systematic review of sensory-based subtypes within children on the autism spectrum identified only eight sensory subtyping studies (DeBoth and Reynolds 2017). Two additional subtyping studies have been published (Tomchek et al 2018;Uljarevic´ et al 2016).…”
Section: Diagnostic and Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (Dsm-5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former was found in one study to differentiate in terms of age and level of adaptive behaviour [31], and in another study in age and non-verbal IQ, but not gender or ASD symptoms [18]. At least some of these inconsistencies are likely to be related to the varied choice of sensory measures employed across studies, as well as the different age and size of the sample studied [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In parallel to the above work, several studies have attempted to characterise heterogeneity in sensory features by identifying more homogeneous groups of individuals via different types of cluster analyses and latent class analyses (LCA) approaches (for a review see [30]). To date, studies have proposed anywhere from two to five subgroups using a range of different measures including the SSP [12,18,31], Sensory Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ [16]), Adolescent/Adult Sensory Profile (AASP [32]), Sensory Profile (SP [33]), Infant Toddler Sensory Profile (ITSP [34]) and Sensory Profile 2 (SP-2 [35,36]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%