2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of soft-to-hard tissue ratios in orthognathic surgery. Part III: Double jaw surgery procedures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
25
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…3D studies have been used recently in analysis, diagnosis and surgical planning; without a doubt it represents a real option where costs, learning curve and working time have influenced the slow incorporation into daily practice (Olate et al, 2016). 2D studies have also been incorporated into the analysis of facial asymmetry, integrating soft tissue analysis and the analysis of x-ray images .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D studies have been used recently in analysis, diagnosis and surgical planning; without a doubt it represents a real option where costs, learning curve and working time have influenced the slow incorporation into daily practice (Olate et al, 2016). 2D studies have also been incorporated into the analysis of facial asymmetry, integrating soft tissue analysis and the analysis of x-ray images .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lastly, the other treatment alternative suggested for this clinical case would be maxillary advancement by means of orthognathic surgery. Moragas et al 16 conducted a systematic review of studies about changes in soft and hard tissues using maxillary repositioning in orthognathic surgeries. They found that, although there are other publications about these changes, more prospective studies have to be conducted to stratify some factors, such as type of osteotomy technique, magnitude of the movement, age, sex, ethnicity, and quantity and quality of soft tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, maxillary advancement was suggested because of the patient’s malar and paranasal deficiency. However, although maxillary advancement by means of orthognathic surgery has been classified as an efficient form of treatment, 16 the patient’s guardians did not give permission for the surgery, and, in addition, the patient did not have any complaints about her facial appearance. Her choice, therefore, was to conduct only the corrective orthodontic treatment with extractions.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smile dynamics are linked to factors like central incisor positions, capacity for mobility of the upper lip, increases in overjet and overbite (Peck et al, 1992;Barbosa et al, 2016); other investigations have also demonstrated that the position of the lower lip affects the position of the upper lip (Olate et al, 2016), so that there are variables that have not been fully identified and quantified in the smiling condition; our results show that there are no statistically significant differences in the value of the nasolabial angle when being evaluated at rest and smiling with only 0.8º of difference. Although the depressor muscle of the nasal septum is one of the important ones responsible in this dynamic for the descent of the nasal tip and for decreasing the nasolabial angle, it is possible that in this sample there is no significant alteration in the action of this muscle either in its morphology or in its interaction with other muscles such as the orbiscularis oris of the lips.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%