2018
DOI: 10.1007/s40489-018-0142-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Systematic Review of STEM Instruction with Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the three peers were assigned different tasks (i.e., Peer 1, following a model-lead-test instruction; Peer 2, providing error correction using least prompts; Peer 3, delivering token reinforcement), which may have contributed to the high fidelity of their instruction. Finally, in this study, peers were trained to implement practices that have been found effective in teaching science to students with intellectual disability, including model-lead-test, systematic instruction such as time delay and system of least prompts, and task analytic instruction (Apanasionok et al, 2019; Ehsan et al, 2018; Knight et al, 2019; Spooner et al, 2011). The adoption of these practices along with PMI may have further enhanced the participants’ science learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the three peers were assigned different tasks (i.e., Peer 1, following a model-lead-test instruction; Peer 2, providing error correction using least prompts; Peer 3, delivering token reinforcement), which may have contributed to the high fidelity of their instruction. Finally, in this study, peers were trained to implement practices that have been found effective in teaching science to students with intellectual disability, including model-lead-test, systematic instruction such as time delay and system of least prompts, and task analytic instruction (Apanasionok et al, 2019; Ehsan et al, 2018; Knight et al, 2019; Spooner et al, 2011). The adoption of these practices along with PMI may have further enhanced the participants’ science learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the push from federal mandates, researchers have conceptualized, defined, and interpreted access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities, particularly those with significant cognitive disabilities (Browder & Spooner, 2006; Dymond et al, 2007). Several comprehensive literature reviews also support the success of designing, modifying, or adapting curriculum to enhance general curriculum access for students with significant cognitive disabilities to learn academic content such as literacy (Browder et al, 2006), mathematics (Browder et al, 2008; Hudson et al, 2018), and science (Apanasionok et al, 2019; Ehsan et al, 2018; Knight et al, 2019; Spooner et al, 2011); and the number of research investigations continues to increase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, to help children get the most out of these experiences, we need to design appropriate engineering activities while considering their needs, assets, and individual potential. Since no engineering intervention for children on the autism spectrum has been designed and evaluated by research (Ehsan, Rispoli, Lory, & Gregori, 2018), we need to first characterize their engineering experiences, explore their strengths and weaknesses in relation to working on engineering problems, and find out ways adults and peers can support them. As the first step to support neurodiversified engineering education, this study focused on one child on the autism spectrum and his mother, exploring the ways in which he engaged in problem scoping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kettler (2012) propone que, antes de seleccionar e implementar los apoyos, es necesario indagar sobre las características personales del estudiante con TEA, en particular, en dos direcciones: la individual (comportamientos específicos TEA presentes en el estudiante) y la institucional (características ambientales del centro y título que desea cursar). Por ejemplo, es de destacar que la distribución de los estudiantes con TEA no es aleatoria en todos los títulos universitarios, produciéndose una cierta concentración en aquellos estudios más adaptados a sus características como son las áreas de Ciencias, Matemáticas, Tecnologías e Ingeniería (STEM) 12 (Ehsan et al et al, 2018;Wei et al et al, 2013), lo cual no significa que no tengan dificultades en estas disciplinas. En todo caso, son estudios más propensos al trabajo individual y con menos contacto social.…”
Section: Programas De Apoyo Universitariounclassified