2019
DOI: 10.7748/nr.2018.e1577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of structural equation modelling in nursing research

Abstract: When conducting SEM, there are many issues that should be addressed. Overlooking these issues may invalidate findings. The results of this review provide nurse researchers with best practice guidelines for conducting SEM and pave the way for researchers to adopt this method in their studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…535,CFI=0.953,IFI=0.953,TLI=0.949,SRMR=0.0376,RMSEA=0.038). The threshold values for X 2 /df should be in between 1 to 3, CFI, IFI, and TLI values should be higher than 0.900, SRMR and RMSEA values should be lower than 0.050 (Sharif et al, 2018). Both model fit indices are showing adequacy.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…535,CFI=0.953,IFI=0.953,TLI=0.949,SRMR=0.0376,RMSEA=0.038). The threshold values for X 2 /df should be in between 1 to 3, CFI, IFI, and TLI values should be higher than 0.900, SRMR and RMSEA values should be lower than 0.050 (Sharif et al, 2018). Both model fit indices are showing adequacy.…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This study conducted exploratory factor analysis (EFA) before conducting CFA and SEM (Sharif, Mostafiz, & Guptan, 2018). Table 3 highlights the results of EFA.…”
Section: Exploratory Factor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All item loadings were greater than 0.5 and significant at 99% confidence level (z-value ranges from 6.970 to 9.103). Moreover, the construct showed a good construct reliability and convergent validity (composite reliability ¼ 0.937, average variance extracted ¼ 0.499) (Pahlevan Sharif et al, 2018). In order to test the invariance of the model across the two different locations, using the second data set, this study conducted multi-group analysis to compare the final model among respondents in Malaysia (n ¼ 104) and China (n ¼ 76).…”
Section: Goldsmiths Soft Skills Inventoryfactor Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A future empirical study is needed to validate the framework developed here. Structural equation modeling or a partial least square approach could be used to investigate the research framework (Mostafiz, Islam, & Sharif, 2019;Sharif, Mostafiz, & Guptan, 2018). Fourth, future research can also consider using a qualitative approach to explore different resources in different contexts and study how an entrepreneur's innovativeness and social capitals affect their business performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%