2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2022.106894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of studies at the intersection of urban climate and historical urban landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adopting the seven-step review process for systematic evaluation and synthesis of research literature [5], this study aimed to maintain rigorous scientific integrity and deliver comprehensive conclusions. The seven-step review, previously validated in climate-related HUL literature reviews [6], is depicted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adopting the seven-step review process for systematic evaluation and synthesis of research literature [5], this study aimed to maintain rigorous scientific integrity and deliver comprehensive conclusions. The seven-step review, previously validated in climate-related HUL literature reviews [6], is depicted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies have adopted a broader perspective, emphasizing climate change studies. Other remarkable endeavors encompass a systematic review [23] and meta-analysis aimed at gauging urban cultural heritage in the ambit of climate change, along with Tianchen Dai's research [6] which masterfully interweaves the notions of climate change and historic urban landscape. Given their inherent vulnerability to natural hazards, historic cities present unique challenges for flood mitigation, emphasizing the potential for NbS as a valuable research direction.…”
Section: Nature-based Solutions In Urban Heritage Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SLR analyzes specific issues or explores specific hypotheses via critical review, not merely summarizing 'all the information' about a subject, in order to eliminate systemic mistakes and effectively integrate facts and views from different disciplines [52][53][54]. This paper, in order to gain a more thorough understanding of RFDFES and to support its sustainable development, systematically compiles and analyzes the literature related to RFDFES, identifies the pertinent research themes of RFDFES, and builds a framework for sustainable management of RFDFES in conjunction with existing frameworks for the sustainable management of agriculture and forestry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diversos autores vêm discutindo a eficácia dos instrumentos de tombamento e um ponto de vista quase comum é que em geral as decisões que antecedem os reconhecimentos legais não levam em consideração os anseios das pessoas e em alguns casos alijam os usuários dos espaços agora tombados, ou dificultam sua fruição SANJAD, 2020;GODINHO, 2019aGODINHO, , 2019bOLIVEIRA, 2016). Van Lanen, Van Beek e Kosian (2022) nos indicam que em certos lugares é importante que as metodologias sejam pensadas de modos particulares, dadas as condições sui generis destas e estudos sobre paisagem histórica, sua importância para construção de identidades, manutenção de sentido de pertença ou mesmo como afirmação política que estão ocorrendo em todos os lugares e dentro de praticamente todas as áreas das humanidades (BRUMANN; GFELLER, 2021;DAI;ZHENG;YANG, 2022;DAVES;FACCIO, 2021;DEMJÁN et al, 2022;ONYANGO;OPIYO, 2022;QUINTERO-ANGEL;COLES;DUQUE-NIVIA, 2021;WOODCOCK et al, 2021). Isso tem se dado também porque, como afirmam Tilley e Cameron-Daum (2017), a paisagem é um objeto de estudo que não é de ninguém; há muito é estudada de maneiras diferentes e sob vários disfarces por geólogos, geógrafos sociais e culturais, planejadores, ecologistas, historiadores e historiadores da arte, arqueólogos e antropólogos, e não só.…”
Section: Paisagem E Patrimôniounclassified