2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.16944/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A systematic review of studies describing the influence of informal social support on psychological wellbeing in people bereaved by sudden or violent causes of death

Abstract: Aims Whilst any type of bereavement can be traumatic, bereavement through violent or sudden causes is associated with more severe negative health and wellbeing outcomes compared to other types of loss. Social support has been found to have a positive impact on wellbeing after traumatic events in general. However, this association appears to be less consistently demonstrated in studies that focus on bereavement, and the literature in this area has not yet been systematically reviewed. This study aimed to review… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and protects against poor psychological outcomes(Juth et al, 2015, Mason et al, 2020, especially after traumatic deaths(Scott et al, 2020). Our findings support this body of research and highlight the challenges of bereavement during a time of huge disruptions to social networks.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and protects against poor psychological outcomes(Juth et al, 2015, Mason et al, 2020, especially after traumatic deaths(Scott et al, 2020). Our findings support this body of research and highlight the challenges of bereavement during a time of huge disruptions to social networks.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The protective effects of social support, and the poor outcomes associated with loneliness, are increasingly recognised (Prohaska et al ., 2020, Wang et al ., 2018). Bereavement increases the risk of loneliness (Fried et al ., 2015), while social support enables grieving people to cope (Harrop et al ., 2020b) and protects against poor psychological outcomes (Juth et al ., 2015, Mason et al ., 2020), especially after traumatic deaths (Scott et al ., 2020). Our findings support this body of research and highlight the challenges of bereavement during a time of huge disruptions to social networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limits on meeting with others reduced people's capacity to mobilise social support. Social support has been shown to be an important contributor to well‐being in many different populations and in many different circumstances—for example, systematic reviews and meta‐analyses have found an association between social support and well‐being in adolescents (Chu et al, 2010), Chinese older adults (Chen et al, 2012), and among those bereaved by sudden or violent death (Scott et al, 2020). Social support has been proposed to have a direct effect on well‐being, but also to have a particularly important role to play at times of greater stress (Alnazly et al, 2021)—the stress‐buffering approach (Cohen & Wills, 1985), which might be particularly relevant at such a time as a pandemic.…”
Section: Country Events Suspended All Schools Closed Non‐essential Sh...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, empathy is an interpersonal phenomenon, where an individual consciously shares (and, in some cases, even experiences as his/her own) common feelings with another person, fostering their expression rather than passing judgment (Norman, 1967). Social support, combining a sense of belonging and the sense of having someone to count on, consists of the help provided to the individual by his/her social network, as well as formal help obtained from professionals and non‐professionals (Scott et al, 2020). In other groups of bereaved people, it has been shown, albeit with some inconsistencies, that social and instrumental support from network members contributes to adjustment and diminished loneliness after a loss, through different mechanisms (Stroebe et al, 1996; Sullivan & Infurna, 2020; van Baarsen, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%